two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and 2010
These two diagrams depict the transformational developments of a road entrance to a city hospital that changed the appearance of the roadway structure and related facilities in 2010 compared to 2007.
As it can be noticed from the maps, city planners, first of all, introduced two roundabouts that substituted simple unsafe crossroads. The first one was situated in the interspersion of City Road and Hospital Rd with the aim to ease the intense traffic from the north of the hospital, while the second roundabout was constructed adjacently to the hospital itself, reducing the speed and, consequently, the likelihood of accidents and possible injuries.
Beside the mention changes, that increased safety of the hospital visitors and passer-bys, some other transformations were not of less importance. From the west of Hospital Rd, the area that had previously hosted three bus stops, gave the way to a wide bus station in a proximity to the hospital entrance, meaning that visitors were granted with the convenient spot to wait for public transport to stop. What is more, the parking facilities were significantly extended, since the narrow room right beneath the hospital entrance from the Ring Road being the parking spot for both staff and public automobiles in the past turned into a staff car park only. Whereas new area east of the hospital became the parking facility for public vehicles.
Overall, the aforementioned changes better served the need not only of the city hospital visitors but all the members of the road traffic in the area next to the hospital. Increased safety and well-developed infrastructure were also the results of introduced developments.
- The pie charts below show how dangerous waste products are dealt with in three countries 84
- Living in large cities today poses many problems for people What are these problems Should governments encourage more people to live in smaller towns 84
- THE GLOBAL DEMAND FOR OIL AND GAS IS INCREASING SOME BELIEVE THAT WE SHOULD THEREFORE ENCOURAGE THE EXPLOITATION OF REMOTE AREAS DO THE ADVANTAGES OF THIS OUTWEIGH THE DISADVANTAGES 78
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 84
- The maps below show the changes that took place at the seaside resort of Templeton between 1990 and 2005 11
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25373134328 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0140016318 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2013964651 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.444444444 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221531692874 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920969321789 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783025750832 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154396399175 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787638981916 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, first, if, second, so, well, whereas, while, first of all, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 7.0 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 1.00243902439 200% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 3.15609756098 158% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 5.60731707317 143% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 38.0 33.7804878049 112% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 3.97073170732 176% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1408.0 965.302439024 146% => OK
No of words: 268.0 196.424390244 136% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.25373134328 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.04607285448 3.73543355544 108% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0140016318 2.65546596893 114% => OK
Unique words: 151.0 106.607317073 142% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563432835821 0.547539520022 103% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 283.868780488 153% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.45097560976 110% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 1.53170731707 131% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.33902439024 115% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 9.0 8.94146341463 101% => OK
Sentence length: 29.0 22.4926829268 129% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 73.2013964651 43.030603864 170% => OK
Chars per sentence: 156.444444444 112.824112599 139% => OK
Words per sentence: 29.7777777778 22.9334400587 130% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 5.23603664747 204% => Less transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.09268292683 98% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221531692874 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0920969321789 0.103423049105 89% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0783025750832 0.0843802449381 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.154396399175 0.15604864568 99% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0787638981916 0.0819641961636 96% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.2329268293 138% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.04 61.2550243902 69% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.51609756098 172% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 10.3012195122 142% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.76 11.4140731707 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.32 8.06136585366 116% => OK
difficult_words: 72.0 40.7170731707 177% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 20.0 11.4329268293 175% => OK
gunning_fog: 13.6 10.9970731707 124% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 11.0658536585 127% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.