Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants. Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information, the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular. It’s because the internet is a more effective method than the regular classroom.
Do you agree or disagree with this statement? What is your personal opinion?
It is undeniable that the technology advancement has significantly affected the method of education in the recent years and the online discussion has proven to be more popular than regular classroom one. This essay will agree with this issues by using the examples from reality to demonstrate points and support the argument. Firstly, the learners throughout the world can easily interact together by cyber method and secondly, the students may get the answers quickly by searching websites.
The main benefit that the online discussion brings to the learners is that they can exchange with friends and teachers whatever information they want without going school. That is to say that they just stay front of computer at home and debate numerous lessons through application of communication. There is more obvious evidence to show that these applicants such as viber, zoom and skype have proven to be more successful in communication than traditional classrooms due to availability and convenience. For example, a recent research showed that most universities allows their students who can be off 30% of class hours for online group discussion.
Another point to consider is that the leaners are likely to get the answer themselves by searching websites without discussion with their friends or professors. This is because the vast variety of information available on the internet where students can approach easily. The fact is that if they don’t find out what they need from a website, there are enormous sources for alternation which traditional classroom discussion can not be tackled due to lack of books or qualified teachers. For instance, a recent survey by Hoa Sen university in Vietnam found that 75% of students who prefer to search websites for outcome than discussion directly at school.
To sum up, technology development helps the education industry to be more effective by offering a variety of knowledge which helps students to exchange information or achieve the answers efficiently and these lead to learners reducing their presence at the academic institutions.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2020-11-01 | Lien Huynh | 78 | view |
| 2018-07-10 | RockyGagKy | 96 | view |
- Wealthy countries should accept more refugees and provide them with basic assistance such as food and housing To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Traditional classrooms in the past held lectures with multiple participants Now that technology makes it easier and faster for students to access information the need for traditional classroom discussion is becoming less popular It s because the internet 78
- Health and fitness levels of children and teenagers are declining these days Therefore physical education and sport should be compulsory for all students in all schools Do you agree or disagree with this statement 72
- Obesity is a serious problem in many countries especially in rich countries Discuss ways to solve the problem Provide specific reasons and examples to support your answer 89
- Many modern shopping centres are now becoming more popular than local market shops What are the advantages and disadvantages of this consumer behaviour Provide specific reasons and examples to support your position 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 656, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome than discussion directly at school. To sum up, technology development helps ...
^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 281, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... presence at the academic institutions.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as, to sum up, that is to say
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 15.0 7.30460921844 205% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1765.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.34848484848 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88154413508 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 186.0 176.041082164 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.563636363636 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 531.9 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 1.0 4.76152304609 21% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 27.0 20.2975951904 133% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 45.8465889922 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 147.083333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 27.5 20.7667163134 132% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.0 7.06120827912 127% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216112792565 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0736936792664 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0461364179092 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123709632781 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.066119358484 0.056905535591 116% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.5 13.0946893788 134% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.07 50.2224549098 88% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.8 11.3001002004 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.05 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.47 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 94.0 78.4519038076 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.8 10.1190380762 126% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.