The colossal upsurge of technology has brought many technological advancements in the field of medical science. The effect of advancement in modern technology in increasing human life expectancy, which were always debatable, have now become controversial. I am entirely of the opinion, that increasing life expectancy is a curse for mankind and I will explain why in the following paragraphs.
There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The most preponderant one is that increasing life expectancy can lead to overpopulation of the Earth. The population of the Earth is already at a heavy number and is increasing daily. If the number death toll widely increase, there will a huge population overfill and that can lead to many problems. For example, the basic needs of people such as food, water, shelter, and so on could not be met if the population increase.
Another pivotal aspect of this argument is that, this can lead to the extinction of mankind. The amount of pollution will soar with more number of people. The carbon dioxide, oxygen ratio will be out of balance and this will lead to the depletion of ozone layer in the upper atmosphere resulting in the penetration of sun's rays into earth atmosphere which will lead to global warming, increase in temperature, and so on.
In view of the arguments mentioned above, one can conclude the drawbacks of increasing human life expectancy using medical technology advancement are indeed too dire to ignore. In my opinion, this notion is unwanted and should be rejected.
- It is usually foolish to get married before completing your studies and getting established in a good job Do you agree or disagree 56
- Medical technology can increase the humans life expectancy Is it blessing or curse 55
- Successful sports stars and glamorous film stars are a role model for youngsters Do u support it or not Agree Disagree 73
- Positive and negative effects of the information revolution through mass media 55
- Education is the biggest barrier in my learning Einstein What do you mean by this And do you think Einstein was correct in saying that 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 13, Rule ID: THERE_RE_MANY[3]
Message: Possible agreement error. Did you mean 'myriads'?
Suggestion: myriads
...he following paragraphs. There are a myriad of arguments in favor of my stance. The...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, so, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 10.5418719212 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 6.10837438424 196% => OK
Conjunction : 7.0 8.36945812808 84% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 5.94088669951 101% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 20.9802955665 57% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 31.9359605911 125% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 5.75862068966 226% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1291.0 1207.87684729 107% => OK
No of words: 256.0 242.827586207 105% => OK
Chars per words: 5.04296875 5.00649968141 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0 3.92707691288 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.92815324409 2.71678728327 108% => OK
Unique words: 141.0 139.433497537 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.55078125 0.580463131201 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 415.8 379.143842365 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.57093596059 102% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 4.6157635468 87% => OK
Article: 7.0 1.56157635468 448% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.71428571429 58% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.931034482759 215% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 2.0 3.65517241379 55% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.5024630542 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.635099367 50.4703680194 108% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.3076923077 104.977214359 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.6923076923 20.9669160288 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.30769230769 7.25397266985 46% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.33497536946 19% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 6.9802955665 57% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 2.75862068966 217% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.330731857959 0.242375264174 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.109716180386 0.0925447433944 119% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.118676324622 0.071462118173 166% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.21364159522 0.151781067708 141% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.128717450408 0.0609392437508 211% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.2 12.6369458128 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 53.1260098522 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.54236453202 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 10.9458128079 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.95 11.5310837438 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.59 8.32886699507 103% => OK
difficult_words: 65.0 55.0591133005 118% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.94827586207 106% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.3980295567 92% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 80.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 72.0 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.