Many people believe that social networking sites such as Facebook have had a huge negative impact on both individuals and society.
So what extend do you agree?
Because of the dawn of science and technology, many youngsters are increasingly attracted to many modes of media platforms. Social media plays an indispensable role in our regular busy life. However, The effects of public networking site on people totally depends on how they use them. With the help of these communication tools, we could make our life easier, whereas overuse or wrong purpose could end up in big trouble. I will discuss both the side in the coming paragraph and give my decision at the end.
To start with, in this fast-paced lifestyle, we are highly dependent on technology, where we don't have many friends. Social sites, the strongest and highly influenced platform for everyone, helps to find childhood friends after a long time. Facebook, for the instance, just type a person's name and it will show a list of people with the same name. Moreover, with the help of it, in a positive way, youth has been started fundraising for the charity work on a special day such as a birthday, an anniversary, and many more. If someone wants to sell a new or used thing, they can just take a few pictures of that product or thing and post it on Facebook with the price and description about it. Other people, who are using the same social media application, could see the ad and interested to buy it, then they can contact each other and trade things online. Adding to it, nowadays, cause of this pandemic, students have been started learning different courses online on this platform.
On the other hand, the invention of the internet has made our life more simple and made us keep connected with our loved ones. But these social networking means have a negative impact not only on a person but also on the community too. People started spending more time on it than they have to. Also, few scammers hunt innocent people by just advertising lucrative pictures or videos on social networking. As per the USA magazine of 2019, about 1 hour of our day, we spend on different social applications.
To sum up, the negative effect of social media could be controlled or diminished by proper use and guidance by user agreements. It has many good positive points compared to bad downward points. So I strongly disagree that social media has a negative impact on citizens or groups of people.
- You have recently started work in a new company Write a letter to your friend In your letter explain why you have changed your job describe your new job tell him her your other news 78
- Write a letter to your internet service provider to complain In your letter Describe the problem and why you are unhappy Arrange for an engineer to visit your home Request a reduction in your bill 84
- In some countries in Europe some children from the age of 11 or 13 go to schools to learn more practical skills that will help them get a job Other children stay in schools that provide a more general academic education What should schools do to prepare s 56
- Even though doctors advise old people to get more exercise many old people do not get enough What are the reasons for this What are some possible solutions for this 73
- Some people believe that having a conversation on a mobile phone in a public or crowded place should be banned Others feel that we should be able to talk wherever we like Discuss both views and give your opinion 61
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 94, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: don't
...ighly dependent on technology, where we dont have many friends. Social sites, the st...
^^^^
Line 3, column 380, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in a positive way" with adverb for "positive"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...me name. Moreover, with the help of it, in a positive way, youth has been started fundraising for...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, so, then, whereas, such as, to start with, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 33.0 24.0651302605 137% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 56.0 41.998997996 133% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1903.0 1615.20841683 118% => OK
No of words: 400.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 4.7575 5.12529762239 93% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.472135955 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.5962460881 2.80592935109 93% => OK
Unique words: 234.0 176.041082164 133% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.585 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 598.5 506.74238477 118% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 9.0 4.76152304609 189% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 20.0 16.0721442886 124% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.4348135035 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.15 106.682146367 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 7.06120827912 74% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.179514612887 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0555952375064 0.084324248473 66% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460444668525 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.111809941328 0.151304729494 74% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0236204577781 0.056905535591 42% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.0 13.0946893788 84% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 10.33 12.4159519038 83% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.38 8.58950901804 98% => OK
difficult_words: 95.0 78.4519038076 121% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.