In spite of the advances made in agriculture, many people around the world still go hungry. Why is this the case?What can be done about this problem?
Over the past decade, many sectors have experienced a sea change in their operating procedures, and agriculture has been no exception to this growing trend, directly affecting a country’s economy. Although many enhancements have been made to the farming sector, populace are still starving in many parts of the globe. This essay will identify the problem with utmost consideration and put forth logical solutions.
Firstly, though ancient methods of farming are being replaced by sophisticated machinery, hunger is still prevalent in many developed and developing countries. One of the main reasons is due to the rapid decline in the lineage of farmers as well as a sharp drop in new entrants to this challenging profession, regarding it to be a menial job. To cite an example many descendants of farmers are seeking better opportunities to ensure financial stability coupled with better living conditions. The farming vocation ceases to be a novel profession anymore and is gaining less importance compared to yesteryears. This could primarily be one of the causes for the detrimental effect on farming by and large.
On the other hand, farming has also seen exponential growth in many aspects which has rarely impacted mass production of commodities over the years. Categorically speaking, though the workforce is slowly decreasing, having a negative effect on the industry, the introduction of natural fertilizers and hybrid plants can contribute to a fruitful yield. This ofcourse calls for conventional wisdom and guidance from veterans in this profession. For instance, in states like Andhra Pradesh Government has allowed people to cultivate on government lands, wherein the produce is bought at a nominal price which in turn creates employment opportunities. This could serve as an initial solution to the hunger crisis which is rampant, however needs careful consideration and execution.
To conclude this essay analysed how measures can be taken to eradicate hunger by using conventional methods of farming.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-12-15 | nbaochi14 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-01 | gunju3305 | 67 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Mohsensnake | 84 | view |
| 2021-11-09 | Mohsensnake | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-25 | jaseya | 73 | view |
- Many people says that globalization and growing number of multi national companies have an negative effect on the environment What extent do you agree and disagree 67
- Some people believe that personal happiness is directly related to economical success while others argue happiness comes from personal effort Do you agree or disagree 56
- some people say that now we can see films on our phones or tablets there is no need to go to the cinema others say that to be fully enjoyed films need to bee seen in cinema discuss both these views and give your own opinion 56
- Some people opine that a new language should be invented for people from different countries to use for international communication How do you think the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 56
- Inspite of the advances made in agriculture many people around the country still go hungry Why is this the case and what can be done about this problem 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, so, still, well, for instance, as well as, by and large, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 5.0 7.85571142285 64% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 10.0 24.0651302605 42% => OK
Preposition: 48.0 41.998997996 114% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1717.0 1615.20841683 106% => OK
No of words: 314.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.46815286624 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.20951839842 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0225614507 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 195.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.62101910828 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 540.0 506.74238477 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.3672530442 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 122.642857143 106.682146367 115% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.4285714286 20.7667163134 108% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.92857142857 7.06120827912 126% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.23007076119 0.244688304435 94% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0732623831279 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0399696384313 0.0667982634062 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.13345840508 0.151304729494 88% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0255481074519 0.056905535591 45% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 40.69 50.2224549098 81% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.51 8.58950901804 122% => OK
difficult_words: 115.0 78.4519038076 147% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.