Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people. Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places?
Many museums and historical landmarks are able to appeal to large numbers of tourists but fail to achieve the same effect when it comes to locals. In this essay, I will discuss the main reasons for this before suggesting solutions to remedy this problem.
To begin, there are many factors responsible for declining rate in local attendance. First, some who live in this region seem to be familiar with their traditional customs and historical events. Going to these places seems to be waste of time and money due to the entrance cost, and absolutely people would not pay an amount of money for something they have already known. Moreover, the attraction seems to be stodgy and too traditionally educative to provide a convincing welcome to the locals. However, these places always pick tourists’ curiosity during their first trip.
Several measures can be prompted to promote locals’ attendance rate at buildings for historical relics and museums. First, those places should serve both education and entertainment purposes. For example, more recreational zones should be constructed to increase the number of locals coming and enjoying their leisure time. Besides, declining entry fees for regional people should be taken into consideration as a method. According to recent research, a decrease of 10% in entrance fees would enhance at least 20% of local people to come to these places.
In conclusion, there are two major causes that discourage locals to spend time in the nearby museums and historical landmarks as mentioned, and proper actions should be taken to attract people to go to such places.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-06 | Tấn Quý | 30 | view |
| 2024-11-02 | thaotanya | 67 | view |
| 2024-07-28 | unstoppable | 73 | view |
| 2023-09-27 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 84 | view |
| 2023-01-25 | Nguyen Ho Khanh Duy | 73 | view |
- When new towns are planned it is more important to include public parks and sports facilities than shopping centers for people to spend their free time in To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 78
- Some people think that the development of technology has made our life more complex and the solution is to live a simpler life without technology To what extent do you agree or disagree 75
- Some people believe that air travel should be restricted because it causes serious pollution and will use up the world s resources Do you agree or disagree 67
- Some scientists think that there are intelligent forms on other planets and messages should be sent to contact them Other scientists think that it is a bad idea and would be dangerous Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Many museums and historical sites are mainly visited by tourists but not local people Why is this the case and what can be done to attract more local people to visit these places 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, but, first, however, moreover, so, at least, for example, in conclusion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 260.0 315.596192385 82% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.22307692308 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.01553427287 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.70082170271 2.80592935109 96% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.619230769231 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 420.3 506.74238477 83% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9322036139 49.4020404114 77% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.461538462 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 8.67935871743 58% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.31506362434 0.244688304435 129% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101359618997 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0364620102603 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.18312817747 0.151304729494 121% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0218126275495 0.056905535591 38% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.0 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.43 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 79.0 78.4519038076 101% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.