Large shopping malls are replacing small shops. What is your opinion about this? (Discuss with appropriate examples.)
Recently, the phenomenon of shopping malls has sparked an ongoing controversy, which inevitably leads to a moot question “are small shops replacing with large shopping malls?”. Whereas it is a widely held view that mega malls are taking the place of small shops, I will discuss controversial aspects of that throughout this essay.
From the commercial and marketing standpoint, multi-story complexes are bound up inextricably with conveniency, which indicates they lead to both facilitating and timeconsuming. As a well-known example, a longitudinal study conducted by eminent scientists in 2014 demonstrates the relationship between environmental factors and hectic lifestyle as well as an exponential increase in car parking problems. Their academic criticism was impressive. Consequently, my empirical evidence presented thus far supports the contention that the likelihood of changing purchasing habits is correlated positively with not only globalization but also lifestyle change.
Within the realm of shopping, without the slightest doubt, variety of choices attribute to ubiquity of mega malls, in that it would come down to being convenient, online purchasing, and food courts. A salient example of such attribution is an economic agenda, which is a cause for concern since it was mistaken to take current system for granted. Had there been a paradigm shift earlier, scholars might have had the opportunity to pinpoint surveillance problems. Besides, this criterion is an indispensable part of modern lifestyle. Hence, it is reasonable to infer the pivotal role of the negative consequences of street shops.
To conclude, as for myself, as the saying goes “all’s well that ends well,” after analyzing what elaborated above, I firmly believe that pervasiveness of mega malls are highly beneficial. However, with the benefit of hindsight, we conceive the more we research, the further we discover.
- The illiterate of the 21st century will not be those who cannot read and write but those who cannot learn unlearn and relearn Agree or Disagree 88
- For a successful company selling products depends more on company s reputation or it depends more on if they provide discount and free offers To what extent do you agree or disagree 80
- Some effective people like repetitive routine such as eating the same food do you like this way 85
- The 18th century due to industrialization a lot of people migrate to develop countries This affected lifestyle and increased major problems in develop countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 88
- The major purpose of television is to educate not to entertain Do you agree or disagree 85
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, consequently, hence, however, if, so, thus, well, whereas, as for, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 13.0 10.5418719212 123% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 3.0 6.10837438424 49% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 8.36945812808 60% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 5.94088669951 151% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 20.9802955665 100% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 31.9359605911 122% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 5.75862068966 104% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1711.0 1207.87684729 142% => OK
No of words: 299.0 242.827586207 123% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72240802676 5.00649968141 114% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 3.92707691288 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.22797749439 2.71678728327 119% => OK
Unique words: 204.0 139.433497537 146% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.682274247492 0.580463131201 118% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 379.143842365 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.57093596059 108% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 4.6157635468 152% => OK
Article: 6.0 1.56157635468 384% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 3.0 1.71428571429 175% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.931034482759 107% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 3.65517241379 164% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 12.6551724138 103% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.5024630542 112% => OK
Sentence length SD: 61.7745471417 50.4703680194 122% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.615384615 104.977214359 125% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 20.9669160288 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.46153846154 7.25397266985 103% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.12807881773 97% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.33497536946 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 6.9802955665 100% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 2.75862068966 109% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 2.91625615764 103% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.284755145543 0.242375264174 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0748560559721 0.0925447433944 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0981321678918 0.071462118173 137% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.15930140664 0.151781067708 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.137074870485 0.0609392437508 225% => More connections among paragraphs wanted.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 12.6369458128 135% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 53.1260098522 75% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 6.54236453202 171% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 10.9458128079 122% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.19 11.5310837438 140% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.8 8.32886699507 130% => OK
difficult_words: 114.0 55.0591133005 207% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 16.0 9.94827586207 161% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.3980295567 108% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.5123152709 105% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 85.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 76.5 Out of 90
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.