We should invent a new language for international communication Do the advantages of this will outweigh the disadvantages

Essay topics:

We should invent a new language for international communication.
Do the advantages of this will outweigh the disadvantages.

Many people believe that invention of new global language will be a great idea to facilitate international communication. I believe there might be some minor benefits of finding new language, the bad aspect of it is too dire to ignore.
To commence with, many people believe that new global language will be a boon for international communication. The central reason behind it is that it might make global communication more trouble-free than it was ever before. For instance, if there will be one global language then people might be able to make friends from overseas. Secondly, it would be beneficial for the entrepreneurs to spread their businesses across the world, since communication might become easier. Hence, there are chances that a new language might prove fruit-full.
On the contrary, I would argue that a new language will only bring confusion and difficulties, instead of proving advantageous. The most preponderant reason behind it is that, not only it will take a long time for researchers to find a new language, but also if they become successful in their research, it will become an arduous task for the senior citizens to learn a new language. Secondly, it will take years or may be a decade to educate the teachers about new language that too from basics, so that they could further teach their students. Certainly, the idea of instilling a new international language is not pragmatic at all.
In summary, even if there are some little benefits of inventing a new language for global communication, its disadvantages are multiple, which overshadow those advantages.

Votes
Average: 6.3 (8 votes)
This essay topic by users
Post date Users Rates Link to Content
2021-02-14 Navi12 63 view

Comments

Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, may, second, secondly, so, still, then, for instance, in summary, on the contrary

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 7.85571142285 204% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 27.0 41.998997996 64% => OK
Nominalization: 8.0 8.3376753507 96% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1333.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 261.0 315.596192385 83% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10727969349 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.0193898071 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05785054159 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 137.0 176.041082164 78% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.524904214559 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 423.9 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.1949371925 49.4020404114 94% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.083333333 106.682146367 104% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.75 20.7667163134 105% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.58333333333 7.06120827912 122% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.297524394023 0.244688304435 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.125339477984 0.084324248473 149% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0597959482941 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.19160669419 0.151304729494 127% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.020333265412 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.5 13.0946893788 103% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.36 12.4159519038 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.94 8.58950901804 92% => OK
difficult_words: 54.0 78.4519038076 69% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.