Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments. Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit.
Discuss both these views and give your opinion.
Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own knowledge or experience.
Currently there is a contentious argument that whether the architecture of new buildings in metropolitan cities should be controlled by government or not. I totally agree that the design of the newly constructed buildings should be according to the government rules.
Government intervention over the design of new apartments would increase the safety of the new buildings. Since same rules would apply for construction of all the buildings therefore, the government would ensure that the safety of people is not compromised. For instance, government rules would ensure that the builders follow the norms related to safety such as earthquake resistance, compulsory fire extinguishers and regular maintenance of elevators. Such rules would decrease the chances of construction of illegal buildings that are vulnerable to collapse and kill thousands of innocent people.
On the contrary, other people argue that the design of the buildings should be decided by the financial investor whose money is at stake. However, I disagree with this viewpoint. Financial investors mostly focus on gaining profits from the buildings sometimes even at the cost of compromising the safety of the people. For example, the news of a newly constructed society building that collapsed killing thousands of people went viral few years ago. Such incidents cannot be stopped unless the government introduces strict designing regulations that are alike for all the buildings. Another reason for introducing government control is this that it would decrease the chances of illegal construction on public land such as roadside, sidewalk, footpaths etc.
In conclusion, I reiterate that it is necessary that the government must intervene and implement strict control over the design of newly constructed buildings. This would ensure that no illegal construction is allowed and would also ensure the safety of the construction sites.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-03-17 | ankita.hpgdc | 56 | view |
| 2020-04-27 | Rabiak | 56 | view |
- Should wealthy nations be required to share their wealth among poorer nations by providing such things as food and education Or is it the responsibility of the governments of poorer nations to look after their citizens themselves 78
- Some people feel that the design of newly constructed buildings in big cities should be controlled by governments Others believe those who finance the construction of a building should be free to design it as they see fit Discuss both these views and give 56
- For many young people today shopping is their favorite free time activity Why do you think this has happened Should young people be encouraged to do different activities in their free time 73
- Air traffic is increasingly leading to more noise pollution and airport constuction One reason for this is the growth in low cost passenger flights often to holiday destinations Some people say that government should try to reduce air traffic by taxing it 73
- Some people support modern developments in agriculture such as factory farming and creation of new types of fruits and vegetables However other people oppose this view Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 52
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ign of newly constructed buildings. This would ensure that no illegal constructio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56701030928 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01787090276 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1100311266 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319911048761 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128671435913 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102437731829 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234967958524 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109496008655 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 165, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ign of newly constructed buildings. This would ensure that no illegal constructio...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, however, so, therefore, for example, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the contrary
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 13.0 7.30460921844 178% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1620.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 291.0 315.596192385 92% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.56701030928 5.12529762239 109% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.13022058845 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01787090276 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 144.0 176.041082164 82% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.494845360825 0.561755894193 88% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 491.4 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 35.1100311266 49.4020404114 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.714285714 106.682146367 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.7857142857 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.85714285714 7.06120827912 97% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.319911048761 0.244688304435 131% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.128671435913 0.084324248473 153% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.102437731829 0.0667982634062 153% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.234967958524 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.109496008655 0.056905535591 192% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.2 13.0946893788 116% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.03 12.4159519038 121% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.97 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 80.0 78.4519038076 102% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.