Some people believe that smart phones are destroying social interaction today to what extent do you agree or disagree
In this present era, Smartphone technologies are extremely developed. Few people think that smartphones are a reason for disordering social interaction. This essay will explain why citizen thing in that way and also give my perspective. That described in the following paragraphs.
To embarks with, there are plenty of situations that happened which push people to think that smartphones are not reasonable for Society. First and foremost mobile phones have a various application such as Amazon, Mintra which help people to buy products from home. That reduces the outdoor activities of humans and that decline social interaction. Furthermore, people become addicted to mobile games, and they avoid to go playground. For example, 80% of students in India spend their free time on smartphones, which was written by one survey of the University of Gujarat. Those are the main two phenomena, which destroy social interaction.
However, there are a plethora of benefits of high-tech phones, which improve social interaction. Firstly, high-tech phones have numbers of social media platforms like Instagram, Facebook. That connect all humans it doesn’t matter they live nearby or far away. Secondly, smartphones have different types of meeting applications, which helps people to take meeting or lecture virtually, that enhance the interaction of civilians. For instance, since the government of India put a lockdown, all schools and universities took classes on smartphones or computers.
To conclude, although smartphones have some disadvantages, they improve social interaction. That connects all citizens in one platform, which they can talk. I do not support the statement.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-07-27 | khiem910 | 78 | view |
| 2021-10-10 | EELLeeee | 84 | view |
| 2021-10-08 | EELLeeee | 67 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | samdilnura | 92 | view |
| 2021-03-18 | Kishanpatel | 72 | view |
- The charts below show the consumption of water for a different purpose in Australia and Residential water use in Australia in 2004 74
- increase the word demand for oil and gas made it necessary for locating these sores in remote and untouched nature areas do you think the advantages out with the disadvantages of domaging this nature areas 61
- In schools and universities girl trying to chill add subject wild boys to sand subject what is the reason Should the trend be changed 61
- The best way for the government to solve the problem of traffic congestion in the CDs is to provide a free public transport 24 hours a day 7 days week to what extent do you agree 61
- Some employer think their plumber academic qualification are more important than life experience and personal skill when they look for an employer why is it the case Is it a positive or negative development 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 411, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'avoid going', 'avoid gonna'.
Suggestion: avoid going; avoid gonna
...come addicted to mobile games, and they avoid to go playground. For example, 80% of student...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, firstly, furthermore, however, if, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 17.0 7.30460921844 233% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 30.0 41.998997996 71% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1428.0 1615.20841683 88% => OK
No of words: 254.0 315.596192385 80% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.62204724409 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.99216450694 4.20363070211 95% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0011571125 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 158.0 176.041082164 90% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.622047244094 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 432.9 506.74238477 85% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 9.0 5.43587174349 166% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 14.0 20.2975951904 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 34.2505294183 49.4020404114 69% => OK
Chars per sentence: 79.3333333333 106.682146367 74% => OK
Words per sentence: 14.1111111111 20.7667163134 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.77777777778 7.06120827912 82% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 8.0 3.4128256513 234% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.131342424963 0.244688304435 54% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.042249713146 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0377989907779 0.0667982634062 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0793197376888 0.151304729494 52% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207073287748 0.056905535591 36% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.1 13.0946893788 92% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 48.81 50.2224549098 97% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.72 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.12 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 77.0 78.4519038076 98% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 6.5 9.78957915832 66% => OK
gunning_fog: 7.6 10.1190380762 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.