Do you agree with the statement that government should invest more monet in science education subjects to develop the country.
Some people argue that the government should spend more money on science education rather than other subjects. I my opinion, I completely disagree with this idea.
To begin with, allocating too much funds in technologically advanced can lead people jobless. If schools use this fund to open extra-science classes, students will need to attend these classes in order to achieve a higher band score. This may produce a large amount of high-tech labors, consequently, a diverse workforce will contribute to high-tech society. The more information technology specialists compete in the same vacant, the less chance for them to seize an opportunity in a high-paying position. This gives rise to concerns about unemployed labors, as well as a slow economy.
In addition, each child possesses a different ability, so schools should not impose them to excel in the same skills. For example, children with higher IQ than their peers may enjoy decoding a complicated code, or solving challenging maths by using logical thinkingThis may be different with a child who use their emotional intelligence to figure out the solution of the issue. If schools force students to specialize in science-technology subjects, students with different types of skills may less likely to be offered a well-rounded education. Therefor, the government should also invest more money on other subjects, in order to improve children's fullness development.
In conclusion, the government should not direct more capital in science education, but providing more funds for other subjects is a wise course of action.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-04-17 | phuonganhdoan04 | 56 | view |
- Some countries allow old people to work to any age that they want Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The bar chart shows the number of books that were borrowed in four different months in 2022 from four village libraries and the pie chart shows the percentage of books by type that were borrowed over this time 56
- the pie charts below show 30
- Do you agree with the statement that government should invest more monet in science education subjects to develop the country 56
- In some countries more and more people are becoming interested in finding out about the history of the house or building they live in Why might this be the case Do you think this is a positive or negative situation 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...idea. To begin with, allocating too much funds in technologically advanced can l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technologically advanced can lead people jobless. If schools use this fund to ope...
^^
Line 4, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucation. Therefor, the government should also invest more money on other subjects...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39919354839 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05926704528 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633064516129 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7585140677 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199520898942 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738044617618 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746697577381 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148809732122 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713703397297 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 31, Rule ID: MUCH_COUNTABLE[1]
Message: Use 'many' with countable nouns.
Suggestion: many
...idea. To begin with, allocating too much funds in technologically advanced can l...
^^^^
Line 3, column 85, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...technologically advanced can lead people jobless. If schools use this fund to ope...
^^
Line 4, column 578, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ucation. Therefor, the government should also invest more money on other subjects...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, consequently, if, may, so, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 13.1623246493 23% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 2.0 10.4138276553 19% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 13.0 24.0651302605 54% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 41.998997996 86% => OK
Nominalization: 16.0 8.3376753507 192% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1339.0 1615.20841683 83% => OK
No of words: 248.0 315.596192385 79% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.39919354839 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.96837696647 4.20363070211 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05926704528 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 157.0 176.041082164 89% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.633064516129 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 412.2 506.74238477 81% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 49.7585140677 49.4020404114 101% => OK
Chars per sentence: 111.583333333 106.682146367 105% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.6666666667 20.7667163134 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.16666666667 7.06120827912 130% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.199520898942 0.244688304435 82% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0738044617618 0.084324248473 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0746697577381 0.0667982634062 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148809732122 0.151304729494 98% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0713703397297 0.056905535591 125% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.3 13.0946893788 109% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.04 12.4159519038 113% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.02 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 69.0 78.4519038076 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
More content wanted.
Minimum 250 words wanted.
Rates: 56.1797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.