concern for the environment is growing and more and more people are choosing to recycle.But some people suggest that recycling is not enough.They believe we need to consume less.
In this modern era, pollution has increased which has caused damage to the environment. Some people believe that recycling should be done in order to mitigate environmental issues and some have different views on it. They think people should consume less to protect the environment. According to my perspective, people should use reusable products and should use them sparingly.
Needless to say, the Utilization of recyclable products has several advantages. One of the significant factors of this assertion is that when people use recyclable products, the usage of non-biodegradable material will decrease. For example, when people use plastics bag which is non-recyclable material, it will harm the environment as plastic are hard to decompose. Instead of this, they can make use of paper bags which can be easily degraded. Another major factor would be when people start using recyclable products, the amount of littering would be less as the product will be reused.
On the other hand, Apart from recycling, people should consider different aspects such as less utilization of the products. One of the remarkable the factor of this notion is that recycling can be expensive sometimes and it does require the usage of other natural resources. For instance, to degrade some of the material, water is used which is ultimately a natural resource. IF people use these types of natural resources to recycles the material then eventually, there would be a shortage of these natural assets. Henceforth, consumption of products would be less then there will not be need of huge of amount of recycling. On top of that, when people consume only necessary things, it will help them to save up the money for other purposes. Henceforward, it is a win-win situation for people and the environment as they will able to save up the environment by consuming less as well as will they spend less so it will eventually save up the money for them to use afterwards.
To conclude, Even though recycling is beneficial for the environment, people should reduce the usage of the products in order to save the environment.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-06-20 | nga2356 | 61 | view |
| 2021-04-19 | krishyparms | 78 | view |
- The diagram below shows how instant noodles are manufactured 66
- The diagram shows how electricity is generated in a hydroelectric power station 73
- Some people say now there is less communication between family members than in the past Do you agree or disagree 47
- Many people want their country to host an international sporting event Others believe that international sporting events bring more problems than benefits Write an essay 73
- In some cultures children are often told that they achieve anything if they try hard enough What are the advantages and disadvantages of giving children this message 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 561, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[1]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
..., the amount of littering would be less as the product will be reused. On the oth...
^^
Line 3, column 300, Rule ID: SOME_OF_THE[1]
Message: Simply use 'some'.
Suggestion: some
...ral resources. For instance, to degrade some of the material, water is used which is ultima...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[2]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
..., consumption of products would be less then there will not be need of huge of amoun...
^^^^
Line 3, column 878, Rule ID: COMP_THAN[3]
Message: Comparison requires 'than', not 'then' nor 'as'.
Suggestion: than
...ve up the environment by consuming less as well as will they spend less so it will...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
hence, if, so, then, well, apart from, for example, for instance, such as, as well as, on the other hand, on top of that
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 17.0 13.1623246493 129% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 22.0 7.85571142285 280% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 43.0 41.998997996 102% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1761.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 346.0 315.596192385 110% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08959537572 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.31289638616 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91471803248 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.468208092486 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 5.0 5.43587174349 92% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.5396932847 49.4020404114 78% => OK
Chars per sentence: 103.588235294 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.3529411765 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.05882352941 7.06120827912 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 5.01903807615 80% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.278573692719 0.244688304435 114% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102691264472 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0598617414654 0.0667982634062 90% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.185402269401 0.151304729494 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0324073041756 0.056905535591 57% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.7 13.0946893788 97% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 51.18 50.2224549098 102% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 11.3001002004 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.37 8.58950901804 97% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.