Technology companies are gathering users' private information for many purposes. What problems does this trend cause and what could be done to solve them?
Over the last few years, the advancement of data collection methods has significantly facilitated the approaching customers process of businesses. These days, there are a number of technology organizations that take advantage of their users’ personal details in order to optimize individualized advertisements and for other purposes. Since private information is open to abuse, it is worth examining the possible effects of this phenomenon and recommending actions should be taken to address the issue.
To begin with, providing personal data via online platforms seems to pose several threats to human security. Firstly, if a website does not tighten its protective barriers up, their users may be at a great risk of identity theft. For example, a cybercriminal might benefit himself financially by impersonating the users thanks to the stolen information, then asking their friends and acquaintances for money. Secondly, when people share their address, phone number, birthday and other confidential details, they might have to deal with stalking and harassment. No matter where and when they are, they could be annoyed by spam messages and unauthorized links given by cyber attackers. This is due to the fact that most such media conveys malicious information which helps offenders manipulate users’ thoughts and beliefs gradually.
There are numerous solutions that can be introduced to mitigate the misuse of users databases. From an individual perspective, it is essential for web visitors to be aware of protecting their own privacy. They would be able to avoid their private details being revealed by not submitting their information without investigating whether the internet connection is safe. Additionally, the involvement of the government is necessary to limit the power of online services suppliers. To be more specific, more stricter regulations should be imposed to prevent technology companies from gathering their users’ personal data and exploiting it without the users’ permission.
In conclusion, many potential dangers arise when the owners of digital networks collect users’ confidential information. Fortunately, the detrimental effects of data leakage may be alleviated if the users understand what they should do to ensure their own security, as well as policymakers help to curb database controllability of technology businesses.
- Although abuse of the system are inevitable social welfare payments are essential to protect the rights citizens have to a guaranteed minimum income in a democratic society Discuss You should write at least 250 words You should spend about 40 minutes on 89
- Some people believe that developments in the field of artificial intelligence will have a positive impact on our lives in the near future Others by contrast are worried that we are not prepared for a world in which computers are more intelligent than h 78
- Some people belive that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Others argue that it is better to try and improve such situation Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 89
- With all the troubles in the world today money spent on space exploration is a complete waste The money could be better spent on other things To what extent do you agree or disagree 95
- Governments around the world are investing heavily in space exploration Some people say this money should be spent on helping people living in poverty or with significant health problems To what extent do you agree 90
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 501, Rule ID: MOST_COMPARATIVE[2]
Message: Use only 'stricter' (without 'more') when you use the comparative.
Suggestion: stricter
...ervices suppliers. To be more specific, more stricter regulations should be imposed to preven...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, well, for example, in conclusion, as well as, to begin with
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 25.0 24.0651302605 104% => OK
Preposition: 46.0 41.998997996 110% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 8.3376753507 132% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2023.0 1615.20841683 125% => OK
No of words: 354.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71468926554 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.33761313653 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.17695150157 2.80592935109 113% => OK
Unique words: 224.0 176.041082164 127% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632768361582 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 633.6 506.74238477 125% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.8395486366 49.4020404114 75% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.4375 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.125 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.0 7.06120827912 99% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.231679500609 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0662761483093 0.084324248473 79% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0460691319249 0.0667982634062 69% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134498508571 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.023026568266 0.056905535591 40% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 32.22 50.2224549098 64% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 122.0 78.4519038076 156% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.