Team activities can teach more skills for life that other activities which are played alone. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Undoubtedly, acquiring myriad abilities by doing work in a cluster as opposed to play isolately. Although working together somewhere works as a bane, still it surpasses to work lonely as per my consideration.
Two glaring views of those people who comtemplate that they must play actions jointly are enumerated following. By doing such efforts not only boost human's confidence but also instill leadership qualities. Unquestionably, when a person works in a group but it does not matter that what type of work is it whether it is educational, sports or business, so in this case they converse with members. Hence, the hesitation automatically is removed and try to become self decision maker.
What is more, youth is unable to become well experienced unless they spend deal of time in a team. Since they willing to know life etiquets that how they treat, talk and understand, team work is fruitful for them. Lastly, with regards to future, workers sometimes get demotivated during work life so in that terms their colleagues motivate them and see them a future vision. So, definitely, in this respect, all starta of people should work in a group.
Despite the above mentioned striking opinion, there are some beliefs about work without a team. As community often irritate owing to their self esteems that is why they prefer to do job alone. For instance, few people do not mix up with others easily therefore they percieve play any kind of role lonely.
To compendium and reiterate my opinion, though playing a suqad act is a worthwhile but isolation work also is not wrong it has its own importance and complications.
- Pressure on the school and university students is increasing and students are pushed to hard work when they are young Do you think it is a positive or a negative development 89
- Some languages are increasingly spoken in different countries while the usage of other is rapidly declining Is this a positive or a negative development 84
- The graph shows the frequency of eating fast food at restaurant among people in the USA 2003 and 2013 81
- The diagrmas below show the stages and equipment used in the cement making process and how cement is used to produce concrete for building purposes 100
- The diagram shows the recycling of aluminium cans 40
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, hence, if, lastly, so, still, therefore, well, while, for instance, kind of, what is more
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 2.0 7.85571142285 25% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 34.0 41.998997996 81% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1358.0 1615.20841683 84% => OK
No of words: 272.0 315.596192385 86% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 4.99264705882 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.06108636974 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78441620738 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 179.0 176.041082164 102% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.658088235294 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 426.6 506.74238477 84% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 5.43587174349 0% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 2.10420841683 238% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 31.8286227237 49.4020404114 64% => OK
Chars per sentence: 97.0 106.682146367 91% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4285714286 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.14285714286 7.06120827912 101% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.116787348396 0.244688304435 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0416348911752 0.084324248473 49% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0363017405791 0.0667982634062 54% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0626667639363 0.151304729494 41% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0320847663977 0.056905535591 56% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.66 12.4159519038 94% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.93 8.58950901804 104% => OK
difficult_words: 75.0 78.4519038076 96% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.