some people think international car-free days are an effective way of reducing air pollution; however others think there are some other ways.
It is often argued that are effective way of protecting environment from air pollution is the days who nobody use their car around the world, while others believe that not only using this ways but also taking other ways to protect it. In my opinion, I believe that there are many ways to reduce air pollution, although international car-free days are not a way which brings back some bad impacts.
A growing body of research that international car-free days have a generally positive effect on the air pollution in many countries. One key benefit is that these days bring the environment back cleaner than before. Obviously, this can lead to decline the rate of air pollution from reducing the polluted air of vehicles. Taking Turkey as an example, in COVID-19 quarantine, citizens are prohibited to move somewhere, so the pollution in the air reduce 15% more than the normal days.
However, international car-free days is not just the only way to keep clean for the environment. One important issue is that the most polluted activity of human is the air pollution of the industrial global chains. This means that the air of private vehicles is not the only main factor which caused the air pollution. For instance, industrial global chains such as Zara, H&M released tons of polluted air in one year, moreover, these companies do not recycle tons of materials which they think that they are not necessary for them to produce. Although the polluted air of vehicles is the factor of causing the air pollution nowadays, it is not the only key driver of their problem.
In conclusion, while international car-free days bring effective to environment, there are some other ways to reduce the air pollution, In my opinion, despite having some positive impacts to this problem, I believe this is not the only way to solve this problem.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-11-10 | nhub2409785 | 56 | view |
| 2023-09-06 | Lee Daisy | 84 | view |
| 2022-06-29 | Taytor2609 | 67 | view |
| 2022-03-08 | vuhieuquy | 61 | view |
| 2021-07-16 | hnhung | 67 | view |
- In many cities planners tend to arrange shops schools offices and homes in specific areas and separate them from each other Do you think the advantages of this policy outweigh the disadvantages 61
- The graph shows Japanese average monthly salary Yen from 1953 to 1983 and the prices of black and white television and colour television during the same period 73
- The line graph below provide the information about the incomes of four restaurants in a city in 2010 67
- Some people think news has no connection to people s lives So then it is a waste of time to read the newspaper and watch television news programs To what extent do you agree or disagree 56
- Some people think an aging population can cause big problems Others however think the aging population has many advantages for business government and for society in general 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 111, Rule ID: HE_VERB_AGR[1]
Message: The pronoun 'nobody' must be used with a third-person verb: 'uses'.
Suggestion: uses
...om air pollution is the days who nobody use their car around the world, while other...
^^^
Line 1, column 184, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[1]
Message: Did you mean 'these'?
Suggestion: these
...hile others believe that not only using this ways but also taking other ways to prot...
^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, moreover, so, while, for instance, in conclusion, in fact, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 1.0 7.85571142285 13% => OK
Conjunction : 1.0 10.4138276553 10% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 28.0 24.0651302605 116% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1528.0 1615.20841683 95% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 4.91318327974 5.12529762239 96% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.67181870496 2.80592935109 95% => OK
Unique words: 146.0 176.041082164 83% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.469453376206 0.561755894193 84% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 482.4 506.74238477 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.7378841692 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 127.333333333 106.682146367 119% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.41666666667 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.458033762848 0.244688304435 187% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.164973122988 0.084324248473 196% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.105771704533 0.0667982634062 158% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.295864643327 0.151304729494 196% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0937046068973 0.056905535591 165% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 13.0946893788 112% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.49 12.4159519038 93% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.13 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.