While some people think that government funding should not be used for supporting art and culture, others think supporting cultural activities may be beneficial for the population and the culture. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
These days, people possess distinct outlooks regarding allocating government funds to certain aspects. Many opine that spending that amount of money on traditional activities is not considered an ideal decision. Others believe that they could better human life by giving monetary support in the mentioned aspect. From my perspective, I wholly concur with fiscally reinforcing the cultural foundation that is carried out by the authorities.
Initially, it is undeniable that the citizens of all groups of ages, especially the youngsters, may reap many potential benefits from this investment. With the unceasingly funding of the government, a plethora of customary values comprising of arts, poems, heritage museums is conductive to be prolonged. Those things are expected to have been invested in expanding the diversity of conventional activities or inheriting the available ones and be productively developed. This underpins the next generation with more notable opportunities to expose to the country’s culture which is also a reliable catalyst in order to boost their patriotism.
On the other hand, there are several shortcomings when the federal government does not prioritize investing in cultural activities. Irrefutably, under the swift integration of various cultures from different continents, the traditional traits are ostensible to be faded into oblivion if there are no expenditures that are pointed to upgrading and emphasizing the quality of customary items. This accounts for the unexpectedly losing unique cultural identities in some certain countries. Furthermore, the elderly could be obsolete in the ages without any old values that may considerably widen the generation gaps.
In conclusion, with the aforementioned advantages, the authorities are highly recommended to seriously consider a cultural investment with the aim of enhancing the quality of human life.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-06-29 | gtuez | 89 | view |
| 2021-05-15 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 89 | view |
| 2020-09-08 | longpm2k | 84 | view |
| 2020-05-25 | Nguyen Manh Dung | 95 | view |
| 2020-05-01 | jojilover | 67 | view |
- The line chart shows the number of children participating in three kinds of sports in a club from 2008 to 2014 78
- Global warming is one of the most serious issues that the world is facing today What are the causes of global warming and what measures can governments and individuals take to tackle the issue 84
- More people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative developments 84
- Some people who have been in prison become good citizens later and it is often argued that these are the best people to talk to teenagers about the dangers of committing a crime 84
- Some people decide to start their own business instead of working for a company and organization Do the advantages for people working for their own business outweigh the disadvantages 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 230, Rule ID: COMPRISING_OF[1]
Message: Did you mean 'comprising' or 'consisting of'?
Suggestion: comprising; consisting of
...ernment, a plethora of customary values comprising of arts, poems, heritage museums is conduc...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, furthermore, if, look, may, regarding, so, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 44.0 41.998997996 105% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1615.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 279.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.78853046595 5.12529762239 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.08696624509 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.19997221889 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.659498207885 0.561755894193 117% => OK
syllable_count: 518.4 506.74238477 102% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 43.2994253621 49.4020404114 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.230769231 106.682146367 116% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.4615384615 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.23076923077 7.06120827912 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.244539208036 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0733180784516 0.084324248473 87% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0368382212034 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.128260188544 0.151304729494 85% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0572947545117 0.056905535591 101% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.6 13.0946893788 127% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 24.78 50.2224549098 49% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.0 11.3001002004 133% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.3 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.85 8.58950901804 126% => OK
difficult_words: 109.0 78.4519038076 139% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.