The only way to improve road safety is to give much stricter punishments on driving offenses. Agree or Disagree?
It is indisputable that traffic collisions have regularly occurred in many places around the globe thus leading to numerous injuries and deaths. Due to this, most people argue that imposing stricter punishments to drivers is the only way to reduce these incidents and alleviate the detrimental effects brought by them. Personally, I disagree with the viewpoint as I think there are ample measures that are worth implementing to constrain the problems.
On the one hand, strict punishments are deemed to be the sole way to improve traffic safety for a host of compelling reasons. First of all, penalties for careless drivers can act as a deterrent, meaning that they encourage people to drive more safely and thus avoid repeating the same offence. These penalties range from small fines and licence suspension to even prison sentences. Second, the aim of these kinds of punishments on driving offenses is to make drivers realize that if they drive dangerously and cause traffic accidents, there will be a multitude of profound consequences that affect not only themselves but also other innocent people. As a result, an idea for a safer environment to live in and a better future is no longer unattainable.
On the other hand, I believe that there are numerous viable methods to retard the significant increase of road accidents. First, young people should be fully educated with traffic knowledge as well as careful driving tutorials. Schools and parents need to teach them the importance of driving properly and the devastating effects caused by careless drivers. This measure could also be done by an extended or more difficult driving test. Another way to remedy the problems is to pay more attention to safe road design. In other words, traffic lights and road bends can be added to calm traffic while potholes should be eliminated to ensure that people can safely drive.
In conclusion, while stricter penalties are considered as the only way to prevent bad driving, I strongly opine that there are more effective measures that could be taken into account. These are educating children about traffic-related problems and driving skills as well as improving safe road design
- Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work Is this a positive or negative development 84
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Agree or Disagree 89
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport Why is it not popular in many places How can its popularity be increased 84
- Many people believe that international tourism is a bad thing for their country What are the reasons Solutions to change negative attitudes 78
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth damaging environment Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 302, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ls as well as improving safe road design
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, second, so, thus, well, while, i think, in conclusion, as a result, as well as, first of all, in other words, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 19.0 13.1623246493 144% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 10.4138276553 115% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1834.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 356.0 315.596192385 113% => OK
Chars per words: 5.15168539326 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34372677135 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.7311692448 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567415730337 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 577.8 506.74238477 114% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 46.0081514517 49.4020404114 93% => OK
Chars per sentence: 114.625 106.682146367 107% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.25 20.7667163134 107% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.3125 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.232326638308 0.244688304435 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0682107083923 0.084324248473 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0543410437122 0.0667982634062 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.14075261386 0.151304729494 93% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0261032866865 0.056905535591 46% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 12.4159519038 104% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 97.0 78.4519038076 124% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.