Today different types of robots are developed which are good friends to us and help us both at home and work. Is this a positive or negative development?
The prevalence of robots both at home and in the workplaces has drawn much debate recently. While some maintain that this development can negatively affect humans considering the concomitant rising unemployment rate, I strongly believe that robots can serve as companions for those in need.
On the one hand, many people argue that the development of robots is a negative one as the use of robots can create economic problems if they replace human jobs. Whether we like it or not, a large number of low-skilled jobs are being taken by cutting-edge robotics systems in numerous factories around the world, specifically the jobs in office administration, logistics, and transport. As a consequence, many workers are made redundant and this, in turn, resulted in a rise in reported crimes including robbery, burglary or vandalism.
On the other hand, I hold the viewpoint that robots will do wonders for benefit people as they help us at home and work. It is indisputable that cloud-connected home robots are already becoming part of our lives. For instance , we can set up the vacuum cleaner to do the chores for us as well as schedule a warm home-cooked meal to be ready by the time we finish with work. These kinds of robots facilitate our lives, save us time and they could also be heart-warming friends, who can conduct thoughtful conversation and make us no longer feel lonely. In terms of work, robots have a profound effect on the workplace. They are capable of taking on multiple roles in an organization and confronting a multitude of difficult missions that we, as a human, may not have an ability to handle. To exemplify, Vietnam has adopted a fully automated process in the nuclear or chemical industries as these working environments are unsafe for humans.
In brief, while robots, for some people, represent a threat to their employment, I firmly believe that they make our lives much easier in terms of doing house chores and dangerous work.
- Today more people are travelling than ever before Do the advantages of travelling outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Scientific research should be carried out and controlled by the governments rather than private companies Agree or Disagree 89
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth is damaging the environment so it should be stopped Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that economic growth damaging environment Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- Some people say that economic growth is the only way to end hunger and poverty while others say that it damages the environment and it should be stopped Discuss give opinion 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... human jobs. Whether we like it or not, a large number of low-skilled jobs are being taken by cut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...becoming part of our lives. For instance , we can set up the vacuum cleaner to do ...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oing house chores and dangerous work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in brief, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96363636364 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89311483574 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.20032397 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2398638485 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826511070077 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610794640907 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124201031432 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691600966519 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 190, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... human jobs. Whether we like it or not, a large number of low-skilled jobs are being taken by cut...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 5, column 226, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma, but not before the comma
Suggestion: ,
...becoming part of our lives. For instance , we can set up the vacuum cleaner to do ...
^^
Line 8, column 1, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...oing house chores and dangerous work.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, if, may, so, well, while, for instance, in brief, as well as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 11.0 10.4138276553 106% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 8.3376753507 120% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1638.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 330.0 315.596192385 105% => OK
Chars per words: 4.96363636364 5.12529762239 97% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.26214759535 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.89311483574 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 198.0 176.041082164 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.6 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 522.0 506.74238477 103% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 44.20032397 49.4020404114 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 126.0 106.682146367 118% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.3846153846 20.7667163134 122% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.2398638485 0.244688304435 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0826511070077 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0610794640907 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124201031432 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0691600966519 0.056905535591 122% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 46.1 50.2224549098 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.0 11.3001002004 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.78 12.4159519038 95% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.33 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 93.0 78.4519038076 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 9.78957915832 148% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.