In order to become well-rounded individuals, all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry, novels, mythology, and other types of imaginative literature.
Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take. In developing and supporting your position, describe specific circumstances in which adopting the recommendation would or would not be advantageous and explain how these examples shape your position.
The concept of a well-rounded person is very subjective and can differ from person to person. While each person has their own definition of well-rounded person, I strongly agree that college students who take courses in which they read poetry, novels, myth and other fictional literature are more intellectually and emotionally sound compared to those who didn’t.
Firstly, reading fictional stories, comics, poetry etc. increases creativity among the readers. Creativity is an important aspect of a student - their biggest weapon in the arsenal. With the induced creativity they can solve much complex problems. As a student there is always constant pressure to perform, deliver and manage things which skyrockets their stress levels making things much more menial. By having classes where students read poetry, novels etc. it could help them get their stress level down and in turn making them very efficient in other tasks.
Moreover, myths and other historical literature pieces can imbue valuable knowledge among students, by giving them fresh new perspective. Students could learn how simple solution solved some complex historical problems and can even use that as a base to current problems. Learning about new cultures also aids in the said process.
Knowledge while having fun would be the best way to teach any student. This could spark an interest among the students and making them to develop as a hobby. A far useful substitute compared to being buried in digital screens all day. Lastly, students could share their own stories with peers helping them to understand each other well - making a strong bond among peers.
However, not all students would equally appreciate the course. But it doesn’t have to be yet another “course”, Rather be something the students would enjoy. Say through an interactive session that is not very much limited to academics and marks.
To sum up, making Fictional literature mandate for colleges has a bit of a downside it sure does have a considerable positive effect on students and shaping them as an individual. The fun way to expand knowledge.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
| 2024-01-28 | Simone23456789 | 66 | view |
| 2023-09-21 | Omar Ibna Nazim | 62 | view |
| 2023-09-09 | wopona8219 | 50 | view |
| 2023-08-06 | Fortune Quarshie | 50 | view |
- In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 70
- According to a recent report cheating among college and university students is on the rise However Groveton College has successfully reduced student cheating by adopting an honor code which calls for students to agree not to cheat in their academic endeav 64
- In order to become well rounded individuals all college students should be required to take courses in which they read poetry novels mythology and other types of imaginative literature Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or 58
- Governments should offer college and university education free of charge to all students Write a response in which you discuss the extent to which you agree or disagree with the recommendation and explain your reasoning for the position you take In develo 75
- Claim Though often considered an objective pursuit learning about the historical past requires creativity Reason Because we can never know the past directly we must reconstruct it by imaginatively interpreting historical accounts documents and artifacts W 16
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, however, if, lastly, moreover, so, well, while, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 9.0 19.5258426966 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 12.4196629213 89% => OK
Conjunction : 12.0 14.8657303371 81% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 11.3162921348 71% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 33.0505617978 67% => OK
Preposition: 36.0 58.6224719101 61% => OK
Nominalization: 2.0 12.9106741573 15% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 2235.4752809 80% => OK
No of words: 337.0 442.535393258 76% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.27893175074 5.05705443957 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28457229495 4.55969084622 94% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.64221501728 2.79657885939 94% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 215.323595506 94% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.59940652819 0.4932671777 122% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 704.065955056 75% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 6.24550561798 48% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.99550561798 60% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 3.10617977528 64% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 21.0 20.2370786517 104% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 23.0359550562 69% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 53.7893767593 60.3974514979 89% => OK
Chars per sentence: 84.7142857143 118.986275619 71% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.0476190476 23.4991977007 68% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.0 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 6.0 4.97078651685 121% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 7.80617977528 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 10.2758426966 146% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 5.13820224719 39% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.19470772148 0.243740707755 80% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0502176400621 0.0831039109588 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0499885237135 0.0758088955206 66% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0930982022606 0.150359130593 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0494320651228 0.0667264976115 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.5 14.1392134831 81% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 55.24 48.8420337079 113% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.5 12.1743820225 78% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.1639044944 107% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.6 8.38706741573 103% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 100.480337079 89% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 11.8971910112 59% => Linsear_write_formula is low.
gunning_fog: 8.4 11.2143820225 75% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 11.7820224719 85% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.