Overpopulation of urban areas has led to numerous problems. What are the problems? What should governments and individuals do to tackle these problems?
It is true that the population has grown at an alarming rate, especially in metropolitan areas. While overpopulation exerts serious effects on both residents’ lives and the environment, there are feasible solutions that can be taken by the government and individuals to mitigate the problems.
To commence with, overpopulation has detrimental impacts on urban residents’ quality of life. It is believed that the growing unemployment rate is correlated with the booming population. This, consequently, results in poverty and in turn, the lack of accommodations due to the increasing cost of living. The significant number of impoverished vagrants across the city streets would strikingly exemplify this phenomenon. Another problem associated with overpopulation is probably pollution. A larger population density would undoubtedly worsen traffic congestion which, therefore, causes serious noise and air pollution. Additionally, water and air will be contaminated due to the tremendous untreated waste discharged from industrial zones. The underlying driving force behind this is the ever-increasing demand that factories are supposed to satisfy.
However, preventive measures can be promptly taken by governments. Local authorities can provide financial fundings to encourage urban dwellers’ migration to rural areas. Besides, reasonable family planning projects should be encouraged to alleviate the alarming rate of population growth, and families who violate would be required to pay heavy taxes. For example, in Vietnam, families are incentivized to give birth to a maximum of two children. At the same time, individuals also take responsibility for easing the influences. They should collaborate intensely with governments to enhance the efficiency of the given projects. It is advisable that they always be self-aware and take effective birth-control methods.
In conclusion, while overpopulation causes a plethora of drawbacks to citizens’ lives and the environment, viable solutions with a joint effort of governments and individuals would address the problems.
- The increase in the production of consumer goods results in damage to the natural environment What are the causes of this What can be done to solve this problem 67
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 89
- Nowadays people waste a lot of food that was bought from shops and restaurants Why do you think people waste food What can be done to reduce the amount of food they throw away 84
- Online communication is becoming more popular than face to face communication in many companies Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 84
- Some people think that zoos are all cruel and should be closed down Others however believe that zoos can be useful in protecting wild animals Discuss both opinions and give your own opinion 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 656, Rule ID: ADVERB_WORD_ORDER[5]
Message: The adverb 'always' is usually put after the verb 'be'.
Suggestion: be always
...ven projects. It is advisable that they always be self-aware and take effective birth-con...
^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, consequently, however, if, so, therefore, well, while, for example, in conclusion, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 12.0 24.0651302605 50% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 8.3376753507 216% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1785.0 1615.20841683 111% => OK
No of words: 298.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.98993288591 5.12529762239 117% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.15483772266 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.39294271504 2.80592935109 121% => OK
Unique words: 184.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.61744966443 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 561.6 506.74238477 111% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.9 1.60771543086 118% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 16.0 20.2975951904 79% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 39.3923364735 49.4020404114 80% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.1666666667 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 16.5555555556 20.7667163134 80% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.0 7.06120827912 85% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.109763774164 0.244688304435 45% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0319193829234 0.084324248473 38% => Sentence topic similarity is low.
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0485968939678 0.0667982634062 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.064374305454 0.151304729494 43% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.00921980121659 0.056905535591 16% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.1 13.0946893788 115% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.86 50.2224549098 59% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 17.17 12.4159519038 138% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.58 8.58950901804 123% => OK
difficult_words: 116.0 78.4519038076 148% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.4 10.1190380762 83% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.