Nowadays, there is a tendency for waste to be increasingly produced and littered out to the environment. From my point of view, this situation is the result that is caused by some possible issues and it can be solved in suggested ways.
There are many reasons why individuals litter more today than in the past. One of the major issues associated with this is that because of people’s daily needs. Nowadays, with the development of technology, the number of up-to-date electronic consumers bought sharply increases and people would do away the old ones as soon as the new ones come up. Moreover, it is noticeable that plastic bags that contain raw food and cooked food are needed on a regular basis as people go to the market daily; and many students under academic pressure buy more and more school supplies which only can be used for a short time. Additionally, a pandemic called COVID 19 which is happening around the world has been causing the increasing demand for masks resulting in the rise in medical waste that deteriorates the environment.
Nevertheless, the problem could be solved in certain ways. One solution to this issue is for the government to raise people's awareness and allocate more funds to the infrastructure of the waste elimination process. If the process was not handled well, the impact would be detrimental and not only the environment would be affected but people’s health could be also put at risk. In addition, the government plays an essential role in raising residents’ awareness and encouraging them to use more environmentally friendly products. Moreover, people should take action instantaneously; for example, they are suggested to start buying more goods that are long-lasting or they can recycle plastic bags and bottles to reduce waste. Eco-friendly products such as straws made from glass or papers, reusable shopping bags and stainless steel drink bottles are also encouraged.
In conclusion, people tend to litter more these days due to several reasons, however, this problem can still be prevented by certain measures.
- The two maps below show road access to a city hospital in 2007 and in 2010 73
- The table blow gives information about consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 78
- The pie charts below show the comparison of different kinds of energy production of France in two years 76
- The map shows the development of Meadowside village and Fonton over three different time periods 1962 1985 and present Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart below shows the expenditure of two countries on consumer goods in 2010 56
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, nevertheless, so, still, well, for example, in addition, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 7.48453608247 294% => Less to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 4.92783505155 203% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 14.0 5.05154639175 277% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 8.0 3.03092783505 264% => Less relative clauses wanted (maybe 'which' is over used).
Pronoun: 17.0 32.9175257732 52% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 26.3917525773 152% => OK
Nominalization: 10.0 3.85567010309 259% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 937.175257732 186% => OK
No of words: 338.0 206.0 164% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.15384615385 4.54256449028 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.28774723029 3.78020617076 113% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88319339856 2.54303337028 113% => OK
Unique words: 202.0 127.690721649 158% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.597633136095 0.622605031667 96% => OK
syllable_count: 535.5 290.88556701 184% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.41237113402 113% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 9.13402061856 44% => OK
Article: 5.0 0.824742268041 606% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 1.83505154639 54% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.463917525773 216% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 4.0 1.44329896907 277% => Less preposition wanted as sentence beginnings.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 12.6804123711 110% => OK
Sentence length: 24.0 16.3608247423 147% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 53.1167370525 44.8134815571 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 124.428571429 76.5299724578 163% => OK
Words per sentence: 24.1428571429 16.8248392259 143% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.07142857143 4.34317383033 186% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.29896907216 93% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 2.54639175258 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 7.41237113402 67% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 1.49484536082 468% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.94845360825 51% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.157513891621 0.216113520407 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531338369616 0.0766984524023 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.037240385759 0.0603063233224 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0949169515972 0.12726935374 75% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0132573152217 0.0580467560999 23% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.9 8.37731958763 178% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 47.12 70.7449484536 67% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 3.82989690722 230% => Smog_index is high.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 7.45979381443 170% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.89 8.71597938144 148% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.98 7.59969072165 118% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 41.2886597938 216% => Less difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 8.62886597938 133% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.6 8.54432989691 136% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 8.15463917526 159% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.