Many people join distance learning programmes (study materials, post, TV, Internet) and study at home, but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does. Do you agree or disagree?
To keep abreast of the 21st century, a large number of people are seeking to receive tertiary education that distance-learning, state-of-the-art educational models have recently attracted much attention amongst students. Despite being a relatively fundamental alternative for some traditional ways to learn, some still argue that virtual education cannot achieve the same effect as the study from colleges or universities. In my opinion, I would advocate the mentioned idea for some particular reasons.
First of all, distance-learning requires the sufficient maturity and commitment from students who attend frequently. This is because, virtual education proceeds in the absence of teachers and tutors to boost our motivation for the continuation of the lessons that are solely suitable for self-control and independent people. Learning efforts tend to be disorganized and futile if a person does not have enough determination as well as the ability to direct themselves in an appropriate way which may appear to be synonymous with the young generation.
The second weakness of distance-learning is its over-dependence on the media. Needless to say, there are a variety of distractions from the Internet that can prevent people from completely and carefully concentrating on the online lessons including online games, youtube and so on. In addition to this, sitting in front of the computers for several hours in succession might result in boredom, fatigue and many other physical problems. Meanwhile, university campuses, in contrast, will leave no chance for this situation to occur under the supervision of teachers. Beside cautious monitoring, the constant interactions with classmates can raise their interest in their field of learning and improve several group skills which are obviously lacking during the period of virtual lessons.
In conclusion, under no circumstance can distance-learning be taken as a qualified substitute of traditional method of education due to the low motivation as well as the lack of direct connection with other people.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-09-28 | ngoctuan | 78 | view |
| 2021-07-30 | ngocminhzinh | 89 | view |
| 2020-12-06 | sanjana rani | 73 | view |
| 2020-08-22 | asmita acharya | 78 | view |
| 2020-08-07 | Navneet bal | 73 | view |
- TOPIC 3 What are the benefits of requiring young people to serve the army Does participation in community work qualify as an alternative 84
- In recent years the proportion of the crimes committed by youngsters is on the rise Discuss the cause of this problem and suggest solutions 84
- Many people join distance learning programmes study materials post TV Internet and study at home but some people think that it cannot bring the same benefit as attending colleges or universities does Do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 38, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
To keep abreast of the 21st century, a large number of people are seeking to receive tertiary ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 469, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an appropriate way" with adverb for "appropriate"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...ell as the ability to direct themselves in an appropriate way which may appear to be synonymous with ...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, if, may, second, so, still, well, while, in addition, in conclusion, in contrast, as well as, first of all, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 50.0 41.998997996 119% => OK
Nominalization: 21.0 8.3376753507 252% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1762.0 1615.20841683 109% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.66559485531 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.34228558372 2.80592935109 119% => OK
Unique words: 196.0 176.041082164 111% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.630225080386 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 548.1 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 2.0 5.43587174349 37% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 54.2204220443 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 146.833333333 106.682146367 138% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.9166666667 20.7667163134 125% => OK
Discourse Markers: 10.6666666667 7.06120827912 151% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.146124945149 0.244688304435 60% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0490364573364 0.084324248473 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0417315447649 0.0667982634062 62% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0803069203461 0.151304729494 53% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0424371556334 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 18.2 13.0946893788 139% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 29.18 50.2224549098 58% => Flesch_reading_ease is low.
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 15.4 11.3001002004 136% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.26 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 16.0 10.7795591182 148% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.