Living under the same roof with parents after securing a stable job and finishing college has been on the rise in several nations. While some people support this, I believe this trend offers more demerits than merits.
On the one hand, residing with caregivers provides young adults with some benefits. The first one is to mitigate financial issues. Having decent accommodation, especially in major cities, to live independently seems unrealistic to those graduates who just have entered the workforce, so staying in the same house with their parents can enable them to save a great amount of money for an independent life in the future. Moreover, frequently sharing difficult stories with family members can help younger adults reduce high levels of work-related stress, providing them with an enjoyable working life. This positive aspect is hardly achievable if they live independently.
On the other hand, I believe that the benefits mentioned above pale in comparison with the drawbacks this trend induces. Firstly, young adults might be familiar with a dependent life in which their parents take care of them. As a result, their motivation to have private accommodation can be minimized dramatically even if they can afford their own lives. Secondly, young people might be put under the stringent observation of their caregivers and be stripped of privacy. This means that they will have trouble inviting their loved ones to their house without the landlord’s permission. After a long time, younger people will be less proactive in decision-making which is crucial in personal and career success.
In conclusion, I reaffirm that despite the aforementioned advantages, living under the same property with parents is more disadvantageous overall considering its risks to young adults.
- For some people making a lot of money is an important goal Others think that their free time is more important than wealth Which is more important to you Explain giving specific reasons for your choice 73
- Many people like unhealthy food although they know it is bad for them Why What are the effective ways to improve people s eating habits 84
- Some people prefer shopping in shopping centers while others prefer local markets What are the advantages of each Which shopping experience do you prefer 56
- We have three important parts of education reading writing and math Some people think every child will benefit from a fourth skill added to the list computer skills Do you agree or disagree 78
- some people think that the government should take care of disadvantaged people such as the unemployed and homeless people do you agree or disagree 48
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38078291815 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87874621093 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3928904791 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283325059455 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890626686413 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534198696064 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177511798263 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561159207638 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, firstly, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, while, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 8.0 7.85571142285 102% => OK
Conjunction : 3.0 10.4138276553 29% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 26.0 24.0651302605 108% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 4.0 8.3376753507 48% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 281.0 315.596192385 89% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38078291815 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.09427095027 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.87874621093 2.80592935109 103% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.619217081851 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 470.7 506.74238477 93% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3928904791 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.0714285714 20.7667163134 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.42857142857 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.283325059455 0.244688304435 116% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0890626686413 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534198696064 0.0667982634062 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.177511798263 0.151304729494 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0561159207638 0.056905535591 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.69 8.58950901804 113% => OK
difficult_words: 90.0 78.4519038076 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.