The best way to reduce youth crime is to educate their parents with parental skills. To what
extent do you agree or disagree?
It is generally held that a skill set should be essentially provided for parents in order to reduce
juvenile crime. While it is parents’ responsibility to educate their offspring, I would argue that
there are more effective ways to minimize illegal acts from the young.
Education of parental skills would reduce youth crime to some certain extent. First and foremost,
the way children are brought up exerts a definitely great impact on their social awareness and
personal traits. Research has shown that one of the most popular reasons for juvenile crime is
inappropriate education from parents, leading to anti-social behaviors and illegal acts from their
offspring. Hence, counseling services should be high on parents’ agenda whenever they
encounter difficulties in nurturing children. Secondly, parents are more aware of the danger of
juvenile delinquency due to parental skills. If parents are educated to be socially conscious, they
can prevent behavioral problems from scratch, lessening the possibility of children committing
the crime.
Nevertheless, parental education is not the optimum solution to the phenomenon. Instead, further
methods should be adopted on a large scale to overcome youth crime. To commence with, it is
schools’ responsibility to educate children not only theoretical knowledge but also moral
qualities. While ethical lessons should be officially integrated into the school curriculum,
teachers ought to impose class regulations to avoid disruptive students. In addition, strict law
enforcement must be the top governmental priority. Prison sentences for serious youth offenses
such as a knife or gun crime need to be executed largely to set examples for others. Besides, in
some European nations, youngsters can be given second chances to atone for their illegal acts by
doing community service.
In short, although a skill set for parents plays a vital role in preventing youth crime, many more
methods should be urgently implemented to eradicate this social evil.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-02 | hieuasroma@gmail.com | 73 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-01 | vuhungbo | 84 | view |
| 2021-08-28 | chirag1234 | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
- A large number of parents and students think that current college entrance examination should be abolished together What do you think 89
- The bar chart below shows the minutes per day spent by different age groups in the United Kingdom on three media 54
- Some people think that schools should reward students who show the best academic results while others believe that it is more important to reward students who show improvements Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Personal electronic devices such as smartphones laptops or tablets are getting more common as learning tools Do the advantages of using these devices outweigh the disadvantages 84
- In the future it seems it will be more difficult to live on Earth Some people think more money should be spent on researching other planets to live on such as Mars To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 21, column 25, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...llegal acts by doing community service. In short, although a skill set for paren...
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, first, hence, if, nevertheless, second, secondly, so, while, in addition, in short, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 18.0 13.1623246493 137% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 3.0 7.30460921844 41% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1742.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 307.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.67426710098 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18585898806 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.91935918745 2.80592935109 104% => OK
Unique words: 191.0 176.041082164 108% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.622149837134 0.561755894193 111% => OK
syllable_count: 534.6 506.74238477 105% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 2.10420841683 190% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.2677919952 49.4020404114 116% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.133333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4666666667 20.7667163134 99% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.4 7.06120827912 105% => OK
Paragraphs: 22.0 4.38176352705 502% => Less paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 8.67935871743 35% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 11.0 3.9879759519 276% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.313683947643 0.244688304435 128% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.118745654934 0.084324248473 141% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.099155226438 0.0667982634062 148% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0901353393642 0.151304729494 60% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0891333309633 0.056905535591 157% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.5 13.0946893788 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.61 12.4159519038 126% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.08 8.58950901804 117% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Maximum five paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.