Some people think that the best way to reduce crime is to give longer prison sentences. Others, however, believe there are better alternative ways of reducing crime. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
It is appreciated that the most pragmatic method to tackle delinquency is imposing longer sentences in jail; meanwhile, other alternatives are believed to be more feasible. Both these schools of thought hold valid arguments. From my perspective, I am truly in agreement with the second viewpoint. This essay will take both sides into consideration and give my verdict.
On the one hand, giving longer prisons to criminals can do wonders for the battle against crime. Initially, this method would act as a deterrent to people breaking the laws. Furthermore, a longer time in incarceration may help rehabilitate offenders. This is derived from the fact that they have more time to feel remorse for their wrong behavior. Therefore, when being released, they would be afraid of engaging in activities that can lead to criminality. For example, in some nations such as Vietnam and UAE, the rapist and the murderer usually get life imprisonment, resulting in making people think twice before committing any serious crime.
On the other hand, I believe that other methods are also indispensable to curb the crime rate. The initial measure is for authorities to hold workshops that educate people on legal knowledge in order to raise their awareness. Besides, governments should install more surveillance cameras on the streets to prevent petty wrongdoers like pickpockets and shoplifters. One of the most effective methods is ensuring that ex-prisoners will have a decent job when they are free, which is an effective relapse prevention plan. Once they possess the capability to support their families, the proportion of being convicted again would dip considerably.
In conclusion, although allowing people to serve long prison sentences can be a great contributor to restricting delinquency, I hold a strong belief that other effective methods need to be taken simultaneously.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-08-17 | teacher.anh | 92 | view |
| 2022-04-28 | vananhxh2005 | 61 | view |
| 2022-02-23 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2021-08-18 | lennie.butera | 84 | view |
| 2021-01-31 | Sprios_D | 84 | view |
- The pie charts below show the average household expenditures in a country in 1950 and 2010 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- As country develops a large population chooses to live individually or live in a small family unit Discuss the causes and its effects on society 73
- Some people think that a huge amount of time and money is spent on the protection of wild animals and that this money could be better spent on the human population To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 78
- Many people say that cooking and eating healthily is better for individuals health than consuming ready meals To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
- Some people believe that it is better to live and work in vertical cities Others however think that horizontal cities are better for living and working Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, besides, but, furthermore, if, may, second, so, therefore, while, for example, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 4.0 10.4138276553 38% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 37.0 41.998997996 88% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1588.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 295.0 315.596192385 93% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.38305084746 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14434120667 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.0229496602 2.80592935109 108% => OK
Unique words: 185.0 176.041082164 105% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.627118644068 0.561755894193 112% => OK
syllable_count: 493.2 506.74238477 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 44.7747400188 49.4020404114 91% => OK
Chars per sentence: 99.25 106.682146367 93% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4375 20.7667163134 89% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.875 7.06120827912 112% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.177473147912 0.244688304435 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0531285565151 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.056014932714 0.0667982634062 84% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.102233986366 0.151304729494 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0284082414623 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.1 13.0946893788 100% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.92 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.29 8.58950901804 108% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.