The chart below shows the value of one country’s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016. The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015.
Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant.
Given are two graphs concerning the distinct aspects of export field. While the former reveals the breakdown of financial benefits in one country, measured in billions, the later discloses the number of the alternations of each categories form 2015 to 2016.
Regarding the profits, obviously, ‘petroleum products’ gained the most enormous export earnings, with about 60 in 2015 and slight increased in 2016 to over 60, closely followed by ‘engineered goods with 55 and 61 in 2015 and 2016. The third most remarkable mumber belonged to ‘gems and jewellery’ with approximately 40 in 2015 before the figure minimally dropped to 40 in 2016. Other categories such as agricultural products and textiles ranged from 25 to over 30 in the periods of two years.
In terms of changing values, it is explicit to note that textiles took up the most significant increase with 15,14%. Meanwhile, engineered goods was about only half of ‘textiles’’s . while that of petroleum products and agricultural products experienced a upward trend with a marginal growth at 3% and 0.81% respectively, the reverse was true for gems and jewellery with 5.18% decline
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-03-29 | minhnhat2002 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 84 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 80 | view |
| 2024-01-20 | hoaithuongnguyen283 | 73 | view |
| 2023-12-09 | Tosyne | 78 | view |
- Scientists say that in the future humanity will speak the same language Do you think this is a positive or negative social development 73
- The chart below shows the value of one country s exports in various categories during 2015 and 2016 The table shows the percentage change in each category of exports in 2016 compared with 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main 84
- Cycling is more environmentally friendly than other forms of transport However it is no longer the main form of transport What are the reasons What could be done to encourage the use of bicycles among the wider population 84
- Many countries import a large amount of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 89
- Some education systems make students focus on certain subjects at the age of 15 while others require students to study a wide range of subjects until they leave school What are the benefits of each system Which is better 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 180, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Don't put a space before the full stop
Suggestion: .
...oods was about only half of ‘textiles’’s . while that of petroleum products and ag...
^^
Line 3, column 183, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: While
...s was about only half of ‘textiles’’s . while that of petroleum products and agricult...
^^^^^
Line 3, column 254, Rule ID: EN_A_VS_AN
Message: Use 'an' instead of 'a' if the following word starts with a vowel sound, e.g. 'an article', 'an hour'
Suggestion: an
...s and agricultural products experienced a upward trend with a marginal growth at...
^
Line 3, column 255, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... and agricultural products experienced a upward trend with a marginal growth at 3...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, regarding, third, well, while, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 4.0 7.0 57% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 6.8 118% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 3.0 5.60731707317 54% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 0.0 3.97073170732 0% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 973.0 965.302439024 101% => OK
No of words: 184.0 196.424390244 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.28804347826 4.92477711251 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.68302321012 3.73543355544 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.09530146536 2.65546596893 117% => OK
Unique words: 119.0 106.607317073 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.646739130435 0.547539520022 118% => OK
syllable_count: 270.9 283.868780488 95% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 3.0 4.33902439024 69% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 1.07073170732 187% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 8.0 8.94146341463 89% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 22.4926829268 102% => OK
Sentence length SD: 57.3856199322 43.030603864 133% => OK
Chars per sentence: 121.625 112.824112599 108% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0 22.9334400587 100% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.25 5.23603664747 100% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 3.83414634146 78% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 4.0 1.69756097561 236% => Less language errors wanted.
Sentences with positive sentiment : 5.0 3.70975609756 135% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 0.0 1.13902439024 0% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 4.09268292683 73% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221646059621 0.215688989381 103% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0835575409891 0.103423049105 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0666919372332 0.0843802449381 79% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.148284978377 0.15604864568 95% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0725285685037 0.0819641961636 88% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.0 13.2329268293 113% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 56.59 61.2550243902 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 6.51609756098 135% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.1 10.3012195122 108% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.7 11.4140731707 120% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.75 8.06136585366 121% => OK
difficult_words: 58.0 40.7170731707 142% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.5 11.4329268293 127% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.9970731707 102% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 11.0658536585 136% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.