Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field.
While evaluating a work, it can be inarguably stated that the work should be judged critically. However, since a person can't be the jack of the all trades, it often creates a dilemma about the judgment of a work from a specific field. The prompt asserts that if the assessment is not done by an expert in that area, it actually holds less value. I personally agree with the perspective of the author's claim and I would like to explain my viewpoint with three specific reasons.
First of all, if you demand for critical judgement it is actually not possible by a possible by a man without enough expertise in that area. More specifically, people without sound knowledge may not make a thorough evaluation of the work, just make a quick check without going to the details. For example, if any student wants to check his college level mathematics by his English tutor, he might not give him the required feedback. Similarly, if the mathematics tutor is asked to solve the puzzles of an English literature, he might feel it abstruse and difficult for him. As a consequence, both may check the work in a rush and just evaluate the work from a narrow perspective. Although it might help the student to improve his work, major points might remain unchecked and unresolved. Therefore, if anyone really wants to get a proper and comprehensive feedback about his work, there is no alternative than checking his work with the help of an expert in that field.
Secondly, the number of specialists in specific area will gradually decline and the country will face troubles when it requires to solve sophisticated problems. Precisely, when a task of a particular area is checked and graded by a person from another area, it diminishes the need for the area of expertise. Rather, more people will be exhorted to have the rudimentary knowledge about many fields to utilize them for making critical judgements. For instance, a police officer may start punishing the rule breakers, a teacher might involve in politics and so on. Consequently, when the country needs sophisticated knowledge of an expert to solve a particular problem, it might not have any specialized person. Therefore, a non-technical person should never be hired to judge a technical work and vice-versa.
Furthermore, if any specialized task is judged with the help of a person without sound knowledge about it, he may add some negative consequences to the work. For example, the nuclear reactors and the atomic bombs were discovered for the sake of protecting the sovereignty of a country. However, due to its' proven negative consequences, the nuclear reactors are redesigned and atomic bombs are recreated with less harmful impact for the future generation. If the opinions from the experts are not involved there, the world might see many more deleterious consequences of the nuclear reactions. Therefore, critical evaluation of an expert in that field is crucial and can't be performed with the help of a general person.
To sum up, although self or peer judgement is often encouraged to evaluate a work, it actually holds no water when it is required to assess the work critically. From the above mentioned points, we can conclude that, in terms of critical inspection, experts' judgement is mandatory.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-07-31 | barcelona433 | 83 | view |
| 2024-02-22 | Zahid6400 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-16 | Jeyodi123 | 58 | view |
| 2023-09-04 | wopona8219 | 75 | view |
| 2023-08-23 | Anil2044 | 50 | view |
- Burning coal in power plants produces a waste product called coal ash a material that contains small amounts of potentially harmful chemicals Environmentalists in the United States are concerned about the damage such harmful chemicals may be doing to the 80
- The Mozart School of Music should be the first choice for parents considering enrolling their child in music lessons First of all the Mozart School welcomes youngsters at all ability and age levels there is no audition to attend the school Second the scho 73
- Do you agree or disagree with the following statement The rules that societies today expect young people to follow and obey are too strict Use specific reasons and examples to support your answer 73
- Critical judgment of work in any given field has little value unless it comes from someone who is an expert in that field 58
- Teachers salaries should be based on their students academic performance 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 121, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
...ged critically. However, since a person cant be the jack of the all trades, it often...
^^^^
Line 5, column 129, Rule ID: ALLOW_TO[1]
Message: Did you mean 'solving'? Or maybe you should add a pronoun? In active voice, 'require' + 'to' takes an object, usually a pronoun.
Suggestion: solving
...try will face troubles when it requires to solve sophisticated problems. Precisely, when...
^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 667, Rule ID: CANT[1]
Message: Did you mean 'can't' or 'cannot'?
Suggestion: can't; cannot
... an expert in that field is crucial and cant be performed with the help of a general...
^^^^
Line 9, column 282, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ection, experts judgement is mandatory.
^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, consequently, first, furthermore, however, if, may, really, second, secondly, similarly, so, therefore, while, for example, for instance, first of all, in my view, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 20.0 19.5258426966 102% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 20.0 12.4196629213 161% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 14.8657303371 87% => OK
Relative clauses : 11.0 11.3162921348 97% => OK
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 71.0 58.6224719101 121% => OK
Nominalization: 11.0 12.9106741573 85% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2725.0 2235.4752809 122% => OK
No of words: 547.0 442.535393258 124% => OK
Chars per words: 4.98171846435 5.05705443957 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.83611736076 4.55969084622 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.88112013803 2.79657885939 103% => OK
Unique words: 256.0 215.323595506 119% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.468007312614 0.4932671777 95% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 857.7 704.065955056 122% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 11.0 6.24550561798 176% => OK
Article: 8.0 4.99550561798 160% => OK
Subordination: 13.0 3.10617977528 419% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 23.0359550562 96% => OK
Sentence length SD: 22.0528090929 60.3974514979 37% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 113.541666667 118.986275619 95% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7916666667 23.4991977007 97% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.625 5.21951772744 146% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 4.0 7.80617977528 51% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 10.2758426966 78% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 5.13820224719 136% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 9.0 4.83258426966 186% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.201461161087 0.243740707755 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0608704958485 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0553116549864 0.0758088955206 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.121797061845 0.150359130593 81% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0207666260653 0.0667264976115 31% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 14.1392134831 95% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 48.8420337079 101% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 12.1743820225 98% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.9 12.1639044944 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.22 8.38706741573 98% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 100.480337079 120% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 11.8971910112 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 11.2143820225 96% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.7820224719 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 58.33 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.5 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.