Some people think environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians, not individuals as individuals can do too little. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
Day by day deteriorating conditions of the environment is a matter of concern for one and all, not only for ruling bodies. It is unethical to say that it is more politicians’ responsibility to protect the environment. Therefore, I do not agree with the statement, I would rather say that politicians can do too little in protecting ‘Mother Nature’ however individuals are more accountable for the same.
I strongly believe that everybody needs to play his/her part in preserving this planet. There are many transformations that people need to adopt in their day-to-day life activities, which ruling bodies have nothing to do with. To quote an instance, they should switch to public transportation rather than using personal vehicles. This would not only decrease the carbon footprints but also conserves precious resources in the form of fuels. Moreover, it becomes a civic responsibility to follow the concept of reducing, reusing, and recycling which can make a tremendous impact in the steps towards environmental protection. However, folks turn deaf ears when it comes to obey rules and regulations linked to the preservation of the environment. For instance, commoners know their duty towards their car’s cleanliness; however, do not bother about the cleanliness of the roads, as a result, litter on the roads.
On the other hand, the government can only formulate laws and policies to protect the environment, but it is entirely upon individuals whether they follow those rules or not. Secondly, it is not uncommon to see that authorities conduct awareness programs or seminars on environmental issues on a regular basis. Moreover, everybody is given basic education in schools regarding pollution, global warming, and other environmental issues. Therefore, politicians are already doing what they ought to do.
In conclusion, it should be understood that we all are embracing the treasures of nature therefore it becomes the responsibility of one and all to protect the environment. It is unwise to rely on the government for everything.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-11 | Chau Anaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaâ | 78 | view |
| 2023-06-12 | Nguyễn Thanh Mai | 56 | view |
| 2023-05-12 | Spring123 | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-03 | TLan168 | 73 | view |
| 2023-02-25 | TLan168 | 56 | view |
- Smoking not only harms the smoker but also those who are nearby Therefore smoking should be banned in public places To what extent do you agree or disagree Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from your own experience or knowledg 61
- Some people think environmental protection is the responsibility of politicians not individuals as individuals can do too little To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- The line graph below shows the household recycling rates in three different countries between 2005 and 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Advertisement of snacks and toys have a great impact on children and their parents So the advertisements to children should be banned Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some parents think that helping their children with homework is good Others think children should do their homework on their own Discuss both views and give your opinion 56
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 747, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...to the preservation of the environment. For instance, commoners know their duty ...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, moreover, regarding, second, secondly, so, therefore, for instance, in conclusion, as a result, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 7.30460921844 123% => OK
Pronoun: 30.0 24.0651302605 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 15.0 8.3376753507 180% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1738.0 1615.20841683 108% => OK
No of words: 324.0 315.596192385 103% => OK
Chars per words: 5.36419753086 5.12529762239 105% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.24264068712 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2238123412 2.80592935109 115% => OK
Unique words: 188.0 176.041082164 107% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.58024691358 0.561755894193 103% => OK
syllable_count: 545.4 506.74238477 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 3.0 0.809619238477 371% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.1323980719 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.625 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.25 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.5625 7.06120827912 121% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 3.4128256513 176% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.287488960262 0.244688304435 117% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0825927268781 0.084324248473 98% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.100649535149 0.0667982634062 151% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.167708776971 0.151304729494 111% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0902615340238 0.056905535591 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.9 13.0946893788 106% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.81 12.4159519038 111% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.06 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 91.0 78.4519038076 116% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.