In recent years, tourists have paid attention to preserving both the culture and environment of the places they visit. However, some people think that it is impossible to be a responsible tourist. To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion?
Nowadays, the response of cultural and environmental preservation has been a controversial issue between tourists and indigenous communities. In my perspective, I totally agree that travelers should take this response and its reason stemming from the awareness.
On the one hand, there are several reasons that local people should pay attention to that issue. Firstly, the distinct customs and natural landscapes bring a huge profit to them. Those who visit stunning locations and undergo traditional culture trigger the growth of tourism industry and services that are beneficial for governments and individuals in terms of financial resources. Thus, they can afford to preserve traditional customs and innovate waste treatment system. For instance, in Hue, the royal cuisine and ancient citadel are tangible evidence for the existence of feudalism so thanks to financial assistance from government’s efforts, they are well-preserved enough to attract the travelers and give them an opportunity to learn the past regime. Thus, government and indigenous people play a crucial role in the rehabilitation of traditional customs and landscapes.
On the other hand, travelers should respond to the preservation of culture and environment of destinations. Firstly, their lack of awareness can cause degradation. It is some improper behaviors such as litter which can poison the ground and destroy the tree shading and eco-system in ambient landscapes. Besides, terrestrial animals might consume those toxin wastes, leading to severe disorders and even death; thereby devastating indigenous animals. For instance, Japan government have to ban tourist on carrying foods and drinks to several temples due to the risk to the holy deer living in those places. Furthermore, the growth of the flux of tourists can trigger the culture assimilation due to the flourished import of cultures which appeal to the youngsters, reducing the number of them learning about their local customs and reducing its diversity. Thus, the response of preservation should lie with travelers.
In conclusion, visitors should concern more about the preservation of culture and environment of the place they visit, and the companion between them and indigenous communities can mitigate its degradation.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-29 | Charles Le | 67 | view |
| 2021-09-29 | Pau Nguyen | 78 | view |
| 2017-04-27 | kingnight153 | 49 | view |
- Some people think that the age limit for driving should be increased to make driving safer do you agree or disagree 78
- 53 The use of social media such as Facebook and Twitter is replacing face to face contact in this century Do you think the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 84
- The older people who need employment have to compete with younger ones What problems can this create What are some solutions 73
- People today do not feel safe either at home or when they are out What are the causes What are the solutions 84
- as the number of cars increases more money has to be spent on the road system Some people think the government should pay for this Others however think that the user should cover the costs Discuss and give your opinion 84
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65497076023 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05676268162 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6950743779 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18558782996 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597685861268 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454291194214 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123451930461 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297430496334 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
besides, first, firstly, furthermore, so, thus, well, for instance, in conclusion, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 21.0 10.4138276553 202% => Less conjunction wanted
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 19.0 8.3376753507 228% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1934.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 342.0 315.596192385 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.65497076023 5.12529762239 110% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.30037696126 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.05676268162 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 194.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.567251461988 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 590.4 506.74238477 117% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 0.0 2.10420841683 0% => More adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 63.6950743779 49.4020404114 129% => OK
Chars per sentence: 120.875 106.682146367 113% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.375 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.8125 7.06120827912 96% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.18558782996 0.244688304435 76% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0597685861268 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0454291194214 0.0667982634062 68% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.123451930461 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0297430496334 0.056905535591 52% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.9 13.0946893788 121% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 41.7 50.2224549098 83% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.49 12.4159519038 125% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.57 8.58950901804 111% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.