Community
"Humans are social animals." This age old proverb irrespective of era holds true for human beings. We formed colonies, societies and heirarchies to survive and eventually to work together. The prompt above suggests two opposing views for community works. The former suggests that local community work should depend on citizen volunteers and the latter suggests that skilled professionals and leaders should be hired for community work. I partially agree with the first stance that communities should depend on citizens for projects because these works are in favour of citizens themselves.
To begin, working together on projects promotes community building and atmosphere of warmth conducive for forming bonds. Moreover, when citizens volunteer to work together it lessens the burden on government and in return reduces the taxes of citizens. For instance, when citizens come together to work stereotypes and prejudices reduce as people interact more with each other. Psychological researches show that when contact with outgroup increases, the boundaries of ingroup and outgroup start diminishing. Further, such ventures saves governmental resources as the citizens are more cognizant about needs and problems present in the local community which need to be adressed. This saves both time and money which would have been spent on hiring a professional community.
It is also significant to understand that such ventures allow students and young children of communities to volunteer for community serivces allowing them to build their character and personality. As interactions with people increase, young minds are more exposed to variety of perceptions and thinking processes and such ventures can allow them to form their own opinions. Social interactions can act as the starting point for peer friendships. For instance, many American shows portray community meetings and projects as the meeting point for adults and children alike for social engagement.
Although, it is also true that hiring of professionals can be a necessity as not everyone is going to have time and resources to take part in community volunteering and the work produced by volunteers might not be upto the mark. However, the solution for this is not difficult. Local communities can form different departments where citizens volunteer for work they find suitable and can manage to take out time for. Moreover, hiring someone new for such activities is also a waste of time and money as the new person will first have to equip himself with the workings of the area and its citizens before implementing strategies. It is also important to keep in mind that such strategies might not be welcomed by citizens, which in turn decimate the need for a professional in the first place.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021-10-04 | Saumya Dhiman | 83 | view |
| 2021-08-11 | Rahasya Barkur | 33 | view |
| 2021-04-22 | SadiaIqtidar | 50 | view |
| 2020-09-24 | Gauri | 54 | view |
| 2019-10-29 | singlade | 58 | view |
- Cooperation then competition 50
- Options and Decisions 50
- Claim Group assignments that students must work together to complete should replace a substantial amount of traditional lecture based instruction in college and university courses Reason It is vital for students to gain experience collaborating with peers 66
- Community 83
- Universities should require every student to take a variety of courses outside the student s field of study 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 1176, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... of life. Such passive acceptance hence, is especially dangerous in subjects of s...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, hence, however, if, moreover, so, therefore, as for, for example, for instance, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 19.5258426966 82% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 12.4196629213 56% => OK
Conjunction : 23.0 14.8657303371 155% => OK
Relative clauses : 9.0 11.3162921348 80% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 16.0 33.0505617978 48% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 58.6224719101 99% => OK
Nominalization: 18.0 12.9106741573 139% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2529.0 2235.4752809 113% => OK
No of words: 442.0 442.535393258 100% => OK
Chars per words: 5.72171945701 5.05705443957 113% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.58517132086 4.55969084622 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.07425106898 2.79657885939 110% => OK
Unique words: 261.0 215.323595506 121% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590497737557 0.4932671777 120% => OK
syllable_count: 755.1 704.065955056 107% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.59117977528 107% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 6.24550561798 112% => OK
Article: 5.0 4.99550561798 100% => OK
Subordination: 4.0 3.10617977528 129% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 1.77640449438 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.38483146067 91% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 24.0 20.2370786517 119% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 31.7554675957 60.3974514979 53% => The essay contains lots of sentences with the similar length. More sentence varieties wanted.
Chars per sentence: 105.375 118.986275619 89% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.4166666667 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.125 5.21951772744 79% => OK
Paragraphs: 3.0 4.97078651685 60% => More paragraphs wanted.
Language errors: 1.0 7.80617977528 13% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 10.2758426966 117% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 5.13820224719 195% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.83258426966 41% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.221524420841 0.243740707755 91% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0606002218611 0.0831039109588 73% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0534461666527 0.0758088955206 71% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.16968643811 0.150359130593 113% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0311382979979 0.0667264976115 47% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.7 14.1392134831 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 48.8420337079 92% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.92365168539 111% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 12.1743820225 94% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.9 12.1639044944 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.42 8.38706741573 112% => OK
difficult_words: 137.0 100.480337079 136% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 11.8971910112 76% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 11.7820224719 76% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Minimum four paragraphs wanted.
Rates: 66.67 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 4.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.