Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released.
Why is this the case?
What can be done to solve this problem?
According to a recent research, it is suggested that most criminals who are released from prisons keep committing crimes. This issue can be defended on a number of grounds and should be tackled to reduce crime rates.
The problem of renewed disobedience is attributed to a number of factors relating to the efficiency of prison sentence and the true situation of criminals. The first reason accounts for this problem is the insufficient length of the sentence. There are some criminals who are underaged or have a special condition that are considered to spend shorter amount of time in jail, needless to say, there is not enough time for them to reflect on their guilts and plan for a better future, and instead of spend time feeling guilty in jail, they try to get out as soon as possible. Therefore, they see being sent to prison as a joke and keep committing crime again and again. Another explanation for the increase in the number of repeated criminals is unemployment. Some people was taken to jail at a young age so that they cannot finish their study and get a qualification to get a job, some are poor and unemployed because of bad impression that they were criminals. These people are so narrow-minded that they chose to commit crimes to make end meets. As a result, there is a tendency that released criminals will be sent to jail again.
Because of its threat to the safety of the society, this problem should be addressed by every individuals and the government. For individual, criminals should spend time in jail reflecting on their bad behavior and the consequence, consider if that worth their lives. People around the past criminals should not discriminate them, instead, they should give people released from prisons a chance to be prove their ability and change their attitude. Governments play a pivotal role in this process as well. They should provide vocational courses and civic education to the criminals in prisons so that not only they get a qualification but they are educated to change their way of thoughts as well. For some repeated criminals, the judger should consider the highest possible sentence.
In conclusion, the increase in renewed disobedience of some released criminals are attributed to the inappropriate sentence length, the lack of qualifications as well as people’s reaction to past criminals. Therefore, individuals and government should try their best in tackling this problem to reduce crime rates and ensure the safety of the society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-26 | sonnn | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-25 | Nguyễn Xuân Sơn | 84 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | wendywill0307 | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-04 | wendywill0307 | 89 | view |
| 2021-11-27 | Jasmeetgillkaur | 56 | view |
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do youagree or disagree 61
- Film stars and celebrities often share their views on public matters that have little to do with their profession Is this a positive or negative development 73
- Some people think employers should not care about the way their employees dress but the quality at work To what extent you agree or disagree 73
- Schools are no longer necessary because children can get so much information available through the internet and they can study just as well at home To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
- Recent research suggests that the majority of criminals who are sent to prison commit crimes after they are released Why is this the case What can be done to solve this problem 67
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 269, Rule ID: WHO_NOUN[1]
Message: A noun should not follow "who". Try changing to a verb or maybe to 'who is a are'.
Suggestion: who is a are
... the sentence. There are some criminals who are underaged or have a special condition t...
^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, if, so, therefore, well, in conclusion, as a result, as well as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 13.1623246493 167% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 35.0 24.0651302605 145% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 57.0 41.998997996 136% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2085.0 1615.20841683 129% => OK
No of words: 416.0 315.596192385 132% => OK
Chars per words: 5.01201923077 5.12529762239 98% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.51620172871 4.20363070211 107% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82536812121 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 193.0 176.041082164 110% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.463942307692 0.561755894193 83% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 649.8 506.74238477 128% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 5.0 2.52805611222 198% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 64.6995191464 49.4020404114 131% => OK
Chars per sentence: 115.833333333 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.1111111111 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.16666666667 7.06120827912 59% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 8.67935871743 46% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 14.0 3.9879759519 351% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 0.0 3.4128256513 0% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.289565189985 0.244688304435 118% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.102046112226 0.084324248473 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0709663507979 0.0667982634062 106% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.211958337671 0.151304729494 140% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0975352140409 0.056905535591 171% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.7 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 48.13 50.2224549098 96% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.07 12.4159519038 97% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.16 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 89.0 78.4519038076 113% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.