Many believe that it is important to protect all wild animals, while others think that it is important to protect some, not all of them.
Discuss both views and give your opinion.
Some claim that all wild creatures are equally important and it is necessary to conserve everyone. While others oppose the statement and prefer only some. However, in my opinion, is to protect all jungle animals due to the significance of the whole.
People who argued about same animals would be mere provocative, wild protector, and so on. To emphasise, many beasts are living only inside the inner forest and they could not create any harm to the people outside the jungle. Reserve such animals would be beneficial irrespective of others who are hazardous and make detrimental effects on humans and other wild animals. Similarly, in recent days many jungle creatures like elephants, pigs some kind of beer are coming out and may lead to pernicious impacts on farmers, croplands, and even in community areas. Such animals must be destroyed and government should renovate the laws of the wild animal protection act, to the core.
On the other hand, every animal may have a reasonable place in the domain to maintain abundance and ameliorate the normal habitable environment. The sustainability of forests and their inhabitants are internally and externally connected not only in the livelihood but also the environmental survival. For instance, pigs are necessary to furnish many disposals and elephants eats many types of grass and bushes which is stunted far-reaching to become makeover. Similarly, the devastation of some wild animals may inversely affect the environment and may lead to climate changes too. Destruction of some animals might encourage the growth of their predators which make danger to other protected animals and vanish certain groups which are overly protected.
To sum up, it is often discussed to protect some sort of animals or all. In my perspective provide equal protection to every wild animal would be a positive effect on the environment and other jungle creatures.
- The bar chart below shows transport preferences among young people in four countries in a single year Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 61
- It is neither possible nor useful for a country to provide university places for a high proportion of young people.To what extend do you agree or disagree 73
- universities should accept equal numbers of male and female student in each subject. To what extent do you agree or dis agree? 78
- Some people think that radio has become out of date and there is no need to listen to the radio for entertainment and news Do you agree or disagree OR With the development of media online there is no future for radio To what extent do you agree or disagre 78
- Some people think that there should be some strict controls about noise. Others think that they could just make as much noise as they want. Discuss both views and give your opinion. 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 7, column 24, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'discussed protecting'.
Suggestion: discussed protecting
...y protected. To sum up, it is often discussed to protect some sort of animals or all. In my pers...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, however, if, may, similarly, so, while, for instance, kind of, sort of, in my opinion, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 11.0 7.85571142285 140% => OK
Conjunction : 19.0 10.4138276553 182% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 8.0 24.0651302605 33% => OK
Preposition: 42.0 41.998997996 100% => OK
Nominalization: 12.0 8.3376753507 144% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1601.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 306.0 315.596192385 97% => OK
Chars per words: 5.23202614379 5.12529762239 102% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18244613648 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80616977985 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 174.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.56862745098 0.561755894193 101% => OK
syllable_count: 526.5 506.74238477 104% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 5.43587174349 18% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 2.0 0.809619238477 247% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 7.0 4.76152304609 147% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.3330275216 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 106.733333333 106.682146367 100% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.4 7.06120827912 119% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.331853104554 0.244688304435 136% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.113528778169 0.084324248473 135% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0824089520479 0.0667982634062 123% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.23387773375 0.151304729494 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0956416022274 0.056905535591 168% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.4 13.0946893788 102% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 42.72 50.2224549098 85% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.05 12.4159519038 105% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.17 8.58950901804 107% => OK
difficult_words: 88.0 78.4519038076 112% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.