Without any doubt, society is divided into two groups as per the distinct mindset of different people. Therefore, this has become a debate able issue whether foreign junk foods should be prohibited or not. This essay will not only shed light on both perceptions but also my point of view will be elaborated in conclusion.
To commence with the first notion, there are myriad things to be shared in its favor. First of all, it will improve people’s wellbeing and prevent potential diseases. This is because, the food contains high rich calories and fat deposits in blood vessels which blocks the normal flowing may lead to ailments such as diabetics, high cholesterol. The second point is, life expectancy is expected to increase significantly as junk food is responsible for shortening life. Although consuming fast foods would help people to save some time in the busier contemporary lifestyle. To exemplify, when people starts eating healthy food habits it entirely changes the health and wealth of family to great extent. As a consequence, in future, we can build up a healthy generation.
Moving towards the second argument of this debate, the first point of this issue is that banning junk food will reduce the cost and increase the popularity of beneficial foods like fruits and vegetables. For instance, people would like to prepare healthy diet at home as well as, they will continue as they get together people prefer to eating healthy food habits.
Apart from this, global environment will become less polluted as a great number of factories are producing fast food and components.
In conclusion, I completely agree that banning fast food products will lead to a number of positive outcomes although it saves sometime only
- Many people argue that museums and art galleries should present the national art as opposed to art works from other countries To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- Farming is the backbone of every country but nowadays many youngsters hesitate to enter in this profession Why is this the case and what can be done to avoid it 61
- In the past lectures were the traditional method of teaching large numbers of students Nowadays new technology is increasingly being used to teach students What are the advantages and disadvantages of this new approach 78
- With increasing number of people eating fast food which is eating too regularly can cause health issues some people think that the only solution is to ban it completely To what extent do you agree 84
- In recent years more and more people are choosing to read e books rather than paper based books Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 11
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ood is responsible for shortening life. Although consuming fast foods would help people ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 721, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...mily to great extent. As a consequence, in future, we can build up a healthy generation. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eat'?
Suggestion: eat
...e as they get together people prefer to eating healthy food habits. Apart from this,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63190808971 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6439014053 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258608680961 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800292831108 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609292129749 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135287891126 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06667146728 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 469, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Although” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...ood is responsible for shortening life. Although consuming fast foods would help people ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 721, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...mily to great extent. As a consequence, in future, we can build up a healthy generation. ...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 337, Rule ID: PREFER_TO_VBG[1]
Message: Did you mean 'eat'?
Suggestion: eat
...e as they get together people prefer to eating healthy food habits. Apart from this,...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, if, may, second, so, therefore, well, apart from, for instance, in conclusion, such as, as well as, first of all
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 17.0 24.0651302605 71% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1456.0 1615.20841683 90% => OK
No of words: 286.0 315.596192385 91% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.09090909091 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.11236361783 4.20363070211 98% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.63190808971 2.80592935109 94% => OK
Unique words: 181.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.632867132867 0.561755894193 113% => OK
syllable_count: 441.9 506.74238477 87% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.60771543086 93% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 20.0 20.2975951904 99% => OK
Sentence length SD: 36.6439014053 49.4020404114 74% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 106.682146367 97% => OK
Words per sentence: 20.4285714286 20.7667163134 98% => OK
Discourse Markers: 9.28571428571 7.06120827912 132% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 3.4128256513 59% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.258608680961 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0800292831108 0.084324248473 95% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0609292129749 0.0667982634062 91% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.135287891126 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.06667146728 0.056905535591 117% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.8 13.0946893788 98% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 59.64 50.2224549098 119% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 9.9 11.3001002004 88% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.24 12.4159519038 99% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.1 8.58950901804 106% => OK
difficult_words: 81.0 78.4519038076 103% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 9.78957915832 77% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.0 10.1190380762 99% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.