Being a celebrity – such as a famous film star or sports personality – brings problems as well as benefits.
Do you think that being a celebrity has more benefits or problems?
Living in glamor and stardom is a lifestyle which fascinates most people, especially young generations. Nonetheless, everything has two sides, having fame and fortune may be compensated by another price. In my opinion, the minus points exceed the plus points.
From one angle, public figures could gain benefits for their personal lives. Profit, to be exact, is the prime factor that comes first. Renounced celebrities such as movie superstars or sports legends could earn money in an effortless fashion, making them millionaire instantly. For example, Cornor McGregor, a former mixed martial arts champion, gained an average income of 10 million dollars per month. This put him in the top fighters within the hall of fame in combat sports history. He used to be a plumber, fixing faucets and saving every penny to make a living for his family. But on his entry to the UFC company and in progress to become one of the top fighters, his life has completely changed. The second advantage of well-known people is public conviction. In other words, the more successful and famous a figure is, the more power to persuade other people he has. It is scientifically proved that people are prone to exactly doing what their favorite characters do as they wish to be like them. That is the reason why products endorsed by celebrities are perfectly sold well to the general public.
Nevertheless, I believe the drawbacks would absolutely dominate the above benefits. Firstly, being a famous person is associated with privacy intrusion, which could be challenging and bothersome. It is definitely uncomfortable to imagine that every step outside home would be in sight of sneaky paparazzi ready to capture images anytime. A private stroll should probably turn out to be problematic because of such photo hunters, stalking and posting poises on media pages. Secondly, being a public figure means more burden of vigilance on utterances. As compared to an ordinary person, a showbiz singer must pay greater attention to what he says in interviews. A word of profanity could jeopardize his career, making the whole audience turning their back on him. Being very attentive to speech might be a good practice, yet it places people in an oppressing situations, for it deters the speakers from giving their ideas naturally, and may sometimes put them in a bad mood. Lastly, famous figures might find it extremely difficult to cope with an enormous amount of workload, let alone consequent psychological issues. The majority of film stars complain about hectic working schedules, allow them no time for recreation, even time for themselves. They therefore normally fall into frustration or depression, using ecstasy as a stress reliever.
In conclusion, the shiny life of a celebrity is the one that many aspire to; the upsides can follow promptly, but the predominant downsides can be attached with them too.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-04-20 | kimnhung | 67 | view |
| 2022-01-12 | lethaianh | 80 | view |
| 2022-01-10 | manhta | 60 | view |
| 2022-01-01 | nguyendangquang.aspect | 84 | view |
| 2020-04-20 | HoangAnh452001 | 81 | view |
- Museums and art galleries should concentrate on local works rather than showing the culture or artworks from other countries Discuss both views and give your opinion 80
- The diagram below shows the process by which bricks are manufactured for the building industry Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant
- Space exploration is a waste of money Do you agree or disagree 84
- It is widely known that despite cars damage the environment their manufacture and their use continue to increase Why is it the case How can this be controlled 89
- The graph gives information about the number of people in Australia who used Chinese Arabic Italian or Greek as their first mother tongue Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 218, Rule ID: IN_A_X_MANNER[1]
Message: Consider replacing "in an effortless fashion" with adverb for "effortless"; eg, "in a hasty manner" with "hastily".
...tars or sports legends could earn money in an effortless fashion, making them millionaire instantly. For...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 1094, Rule ID: GENERAL_XX[1]
Message: Use simply 'public'.
Suggestion: public
...ebrities are perfectly sold well to the general public. Nevertheless, I believe the drawback...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, if, lastly, may, nevertheless, nonetheless, second, secondly, so, therefore, well, for example, in conclusion, such as, in my opinion, in other words
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 23.0 13.1623246493 175% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 14.0 7.85571142285 178% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 34.0 24.0651302605 141% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2422.0 1615.20841683 150% => OK
No of words: 472.0 315.596192385 150% => Less content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.1313559322 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.6610686524 4.20363070211 111% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78457541491 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 302.0 176.041082164 172% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.639830508475 0.561755894193 114% => OK
syllable_count: 767.7 506.74238477 151% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 11.0 2.52805611222 435% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 16.0721442886 162% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 34.4126542021 49.4020404114 70% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.1538461538 106.682146367 87% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.1538461538 20.7667163134 87% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.53846153846 7.06120827912 93% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 15.0 8.67935871743 173% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 6.0 3.9879759519 150% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.245023945054 0.244688304435 100% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0534909004093 0.084324248473 63% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.044624128026 0.0667982634062 67% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.120763024937 0.151304729494 80% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0620081178738 0.056905535591 109% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.8 13.0946893788 90% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.61 8.58950901804 112% => OK
difficult_words: 152.0 78.4519038076 194% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.