The development of tourism contributed to English becoming the most prominent language in the world. Some people think that this will lead to English becoming the only language to be spoken globally.
What are the advantages and disadvantages to having one language in the world?
International tourism is increasing the demand for the English language, and it is even argued that English may eventually become the universal language for the whole world. I believe having a common language for the entire world population can be beneficial for international relations but may also lead to the deterioration of cultural identity.
On the one hand, a sole language for the entire globe could result in some obvious benefits. Firstly, both political and business relations could significantly improve since the communications between states and companies would become smoother and more efficient. Cases of miscommunication would also be avoided since interactions would take place directly between the parties involved rather than through third-party translators. Secondly, having a common world language would allow people to spend the time and energy used to learn foreign languages on more beneficial activities such as learning other academic subjects. This would lead to higher levels of scientific achievements.
On the other hand, the problems associated with this phenomenon can be two-fold. To start with, if everyone in the world spoke the same language, then the need for such professionals as foreign languages teachers and translators would disappear, which would make a large number of individuals employed in these areas unemployed. Even more importantly, the problems would be felt on a cultural level as well because people from different nationalities would not be able to identify themselves with their own languages anymore. This would also diminish the importance of cultural heritage created in the national languages of individual countries.
In conclusion, speaking one global language could bring about both advantages such as improved business and political relations and disadvantages like increased unemployment.
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- The chart below shows the changes in three different areas of crime in Manchester city centre from 2003 2012
- Young people in the modern world seem to have more power and influence than any previous young generation Why is this the case What impact does this have on the relationship between old and young people 87
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 264, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
...ators would disappear, which would make a large number of individuals employed in these areas une...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 7, column 175, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...sadvantages like increased unemployment.
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, if, may, second, secondly, so, then, third, well, as for, in conclusion, such as, to start with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 7.30460921844 27% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 9.0 24.0651302605 37% => OK
Preposition: 32.0 41.998997996 76% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1591.0 1615.20841683 99% => OK
No of words: 277.0 315.596192385 88% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.74368231047 5.12529762239 112% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.07962216107 4.20363070211 97% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.10125743911 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 162.0 176.041082164 92% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.584837545126 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 495.9 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 12.0 16.0721442886 75% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 52.3152835115 49.4020404114 106% => OK
Chars per sentence: 132.583333333 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.0833333333 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 11.75 7.06120827912 166% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.259787558085 0.244688304435 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0969157196029 0.084324248473 115% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0552342695762 0.0667982634062 83% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.158821143924 0.151304729494 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0418781415795 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.1 13.0946893788 131% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 31.21 50.2224549098 62% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.6 11.3001002004 129% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.31 12.4159519038 131% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.45 8.58950901804 110% => OK
difficult_words: 82.0 78.4519038076 105% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.5 9.78957915832 128% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.