Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with highest marks, others say they should accept people with all ages, even if they did not do well at school.
These days, there has been a question among individuals whether colleges should either provide chances to young pupils with noticeable points or accept people from all ages despite their poor academic performance. In this essay, I will discuss both views and give my own viewpoint.
On the one hand, it is obvious that universities should only allow young students with the highest marks because of several reasons. The first cause is that the college studying environment requires people who could suffer from pressure as they have to conduct many researches and reports during their courses. Hence, healthier and more energetic young individuals might be more suitable to learn in this highly-pressure environment.
Moreover, colleges could ensure the quality of education once they accept only students with highest points from the entrance exams. This is because these students could be the most intelligent test takers during the exams; hence, universities do not have to suspect the academic quality of these pupils.
On the other hand, there are a number of reasons why colleges should provide opportunities for all individuals. The most pivotal cause is that this could give people more chances to access further education. Therefore, universities could train more qualified and talented students and give more sources of employees to companies. This, in the long term, could improve the country’s economy. Additionally, when universities offer places for all individuals, they could get more studying fees. Hence, they would have more budget to construct new facilities and employ high-quality teachers and professors.
To sum up, it is clear that there are two opposite opinions about whether universities should either allow students with remarkable academic achievements or accept all people. In my own viewpoint, colleges should only provide chances for students with the highest points because of the reasons I mentioned.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-01-07 | Nguyenkhanh7705 | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | mah.sa | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | mah.sa | 73 | view |
| 2020-07-20 | mah.sa | 73 | view |
| 2018-10-24 | vishal sachdeva | 86 | view |
- The table below gives information on consumer spending on different items in five different countries in 2002 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The charts below show the proportions of British students at one university in England who were able to speak other languages in addition to English in 2000 and 2010 73
- Many people say that universities should only offer places to young students with highest marks others say they should accept people with all ages even if they did not do well at school 73
- Some people say that the only reason for learning a foreign language is in order to travel or work in a foreign country Others say that these are not the only reasons why someone should learn a foreign language 73
- Governments should spend more money on railways rather than roads To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement 73
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...ducation once they accept only students with highest points from the entrance exams. This is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76289809585 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2764888683 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.066666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308225767954 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103004266362 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787402861053 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179529560233 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372636489651 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 4, column 89, Rule ID: THE_SUPERLATIVE[2]
Message: A determiner is probably missing here: 'with the highest'.
Suggestion: with the highest
...ducation once they accept only students with highest points from the entrance exams. This is...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, hence, if, moreover, so, therefore, to sum up, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 10.0 13.1623246493 76% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 7.0 8.3376753507 84% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1651.0 1615.20841683 102% => OK
No of words: 299.0 315.596192385 95% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.52173913043 5.12529762239 108% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.1583189471 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.76289809585 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 161.0 176.041082164 91% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.538461538462 0.561755894193 96% => OK
syllable_count: 498.6 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 40.2764888683 49.4020404114 82% => OK
Chars per sentence: 110.066666667 106.682146367 103% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.9333333333 20.7667163134 96% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.73333333333 7.06120827912 67% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.308225767954 0.244688304435 126% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.103004266362 0.084324248473 122% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0787402861053 0.0667982634062 118% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.179529560233 0.151304729494 119% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0372636489651 0.056905535591 65% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.5 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 43.73 50.2224549098 87% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.74 12.4159519038 119% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.49 8.58950901804 99% => OK
difficult_words: 74.0 78.4519038076 94% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 15.0 10.7795591182 139% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.