Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future.
The given statement emphasise on the advice to the government to solve currently faced problem rather than anticipating future problem. Though I agree the most of the future problem arise based on current actions, but, it does not mean all the possible problems in future can be solved by current actions. Also it is best practice to be ready with plan for all possible threats. So, I would partially disagree with the given statement.
I would firstly focus on the quote that 'Precaution is better than cure'. Since, late history we have observed that pre-planning has always helped humans to make good decision as compared to unprepared decisions. Though it is true that atlast we are going to face problem in the future itself, but sometimes preparing for possible consequences helps a lot decreamenting severity and even sometimes avoid them. For an instance, currently the whole world is suffering from rage of pandemic of Corona. At this moment, we are moving through the wave 3 of COVID and may expect wave 4 soon. Thus, it becomes sensible to make arrangements in terms of resources, money, facilities, skilled workers and others to tackle the future outbreaks with ease. Thus, I am on stand of not ignoring the anticipation of future.
Another thing I would like to put forth is the most of the problems occuring in real-life are of long term. They are a complex problems formed from simple problems. Before reaching final goal we need to solve some basic stages of the problems. Thus, it is always helpful to identify this possible occuring stages and all small problems that will be faced in future. This will help us to use some previous experience resembling to occuring problem. For an example, there is a production cycle in software industry. It consist of multiple stages such as collecting data, preparing design, implementation, evaluation, deployment and maintainence. It adversely affect product quality if any of the stage goes wrong, thus, emphasising in planning such stages will always help. So, keeping future insight will always help.
Even if planning future can be part of the problem solving process, main objective is solving the problem. Though, precaution is necessary for future occuring problems, it does not mean to leave current problems that may evolve into future problems unsolved. Sometimes, future problem occurance can be avoided by solving some current problems. For an instance, Avenger : Endgame is movie in which they show superheros going to past and trying to solve the present problems. This tells us that some actions taken at this moment may decide the fate of future occurance of problems, so, focusing on immediate problem is equally necessary.
Finally, while concluding I would like to say even if solving current problem can help to future consequences, it is always good practice to anticipate future and be ready for all possiblities.
- The following appeared in a memorandum from the planning department of an electric power company Several recent surveys indicate that home owners are increasingly eager to conserve energy At the same time manufacturers are now marketing many home applianc 70
- Nature s Way a chain of stores selling health food and other health related products is opening its next franchise in the town of Plainsville The store should prove to be very successful Nature s Way franchises tend to be most profitable in areas where re 58
- The following appeared in a letter from the owner of the Sunnyside Towers apartment complex to its manager One month ago all the showerheads in the first three buildings of the Sunnyside Towers complex were modified to restrict maximum water flow to one t 73
- Governments should focus on solving the immediate problems of today rather than on trying to solve the anticipated problems of the future 50
- The following appeared in a memo from a vice president of a manufacturing company During the past year workers at our newly opened factory reported 30 percent more on the job accidents than workers at nearby Panoply Industries Panoply produces products ve 66
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 307, Rule ID: SENT_START_CONJUNCTIVE_LINKING_ADVERB_COMMA[1]
Message: Did you forget a comma after a conjunctive/linking adverb?
Suggestion: Also,
...uture can be solved by current actions. Also it is best practice to be ready with pl...
^^^^
Line 1, column 323, Rule ID: ADMIT_ENJOY_VB[1]
Message: This verb is used with the gerund form: 'practice being'.
Suggestion: practice being
...ved by current actions. Also it is best practice to be ready with plan for all possible threat...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 127, Rule ID: A_PLURAL[2]
Message: Don't use indefinite articles with plural words. Did you mean 'problem'?
Suggestion: problem
...fe are of long term. They are a complex problems formed from simple problems. Before rea...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 165, Rule ID: SENTENCE_FRAGMENT[1]
Message: “Before” at the beginning of a sentence requires a 2nd clause. Maybe a comma, question or exclamation mark is missing, or the sentence is incomplete and should be joined with the following sentence.
...x problems formed from simple problems. Before reaching final goal we need to solve so...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 355, Rule ID: IN_PAST[1]
Message: Did you mean: 'in the future'?
Suggestion: in the future
...d all small problems that will be faced in future. This will help us to use some previous...
^^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 517, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'consists'?
Suggestion: consists
...oduction cycle in software industry. It consist of multiple stages such as collecting d...
^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 657, Rule ID: IT_VBZ[1]
Message: Did you mean 'affects'?
Suggestion: affects
...ployment and maintainence. It adversely affect product quality if any of the stage goe...
^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, firstly, if, may, so, thus, while, another thing, even so, such as, it is true
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 22.0 19.5258426966 113% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 16.0 12.4196629213 129% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 14.8657303371 54% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 11.3162921348 62% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 36.0 33.0505617978 109% => OK
Preposition: 62.0 58.6224719101 106% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 12.9106741573 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2419.0 2235.4752809 108% => OK
No of words: 476.0 442.535393258 108% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08193277311 5.05705443957 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.67091256922 4.55969084622 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.71519631052 2.79657885939 97% => OK
Unique words: 242.0 215.323595506 112% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.508403361345 0.4932671777 103% => OK
syllable_count: 762.3 704.065955056 108% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.59117977528 101% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 14.0 6.24550561798 224% => Less pronouns wanted as sentence beginning.
Article: 1.0 4.99550561798 20% => OK
Subordination: 5.0 3.10617977528 161% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 1.77640449438 56% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.38483146067 46% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 26.0 20.2370786517 128% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 23.0359550562 78% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 42.9041176766 60.3974514979 71% => OK
Chars per sentence: 93.0384615385 118.986275619 78% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3076923077 23.4991977007 78% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.03846153846 5.21951772744 77% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.97078651685 101% => OK
Language errors: 7.0 7.80617977528 90% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 10.2758426966 88% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 13.0 5.13820224719 253% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 4.83258426966 83% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.355613773753 0.243740707755 146% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.100503829112 0.0831039109588 121% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.117519603126 0.0758088955206 155% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.217753683391 0.150359130593 145% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.10582579554 0.0667264976115 159% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.7 14.1392134831 83% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 48.8420337079 109% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.92365168539 39% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 12.1743820225 85% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.1639044944 100% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.51 8.38706741573 101% => OK
difficult_words: 120.0 100.480337079 119% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.5 11.8971910112 63% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 11.2143820225 82% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 11.7820224719 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 50.0 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 3.0 Out of 6
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.