In the future, nobody will buy printed newspapers or books because they will be able to read everything they want online without paying.
To what extent do you agree or disagree with this statement?
There are some opinions that in years to come, there would be no demand for paper-based newspapers and books and people would have read every documents online without any fee. Although this can be true to a certain extent, I would argue that this would not be the case.
On the one hand, it is justifiable why some individuals believe in the aforementioned prospect. The advent of the Internet in these recent years has made e-books and online newspapers more popular among citizens. This phenomenon, combined with the advancement in technology which could be made in the future, would guarantee individuals with a wide choice of books and newspapers online. In addition, reading online may require no payment because the absence of the printing process enables posting online documents to be cost-free.
On the other hand, I believe that the future of reading would not be as described. Printed books and newspapers would remain in demand because they are more beneficial for readers' health when compared to computer-based ones. In order to read online, readers have to spend long hours in front of the screens, which would be harmful to their well-being. In that case, traditional reading proves to be a better choice. Moreover, as the demand for online documents increases, manufacturers will see the potential profit they could make from books and newspapers online, thus charging users a fee to access these documents. Take the New York Times for an instance, this online newspaper requires people to pay before allowing them to read the news comfortably.
In conclusion, though some people believe in the existence of demand for traditional books and newspapers and the possibility to read online free in the future, I would contend that this prospect would not happen in the following years.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2024-11-24 | hahoaan | 78 | view |
2024-11-06 | Nguyen Thinh | 56 | view |
2024-10-11 | bigbuu97 | 73 | view |
2023-12-05 | Daniel3003 | 61 | view |
2023-11-28 | huynguyen3726 | 56 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the hours per week that teenagers spend doing certain activities in Chester from 2002 to 2007 11
- The graph below shows information about the activities that Australian and New Zealand children enjoy doing most in 2007
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children Discuss both of these views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that school children should not be given homework by their teachers whereas others argue that homework plays an important role in the education of children To what extent do you agree or disagree 61
- Crime is a big problem in the world many people believe that nothing can be done to prevent it To what extent do you agree or disagree Give your own opinion 56
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10810810811 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73283874328 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52027027027 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7716461671 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.307692308 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272781396352 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101573558 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408646650496 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168843935001 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053243337716 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Transition Words or Phrases used:
if, may, moreover, so, thus, well, in addition, in conclusion, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 15.0 7.85571142285 191% => OK
Conjunction : 8.0 10.4138276553 77% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 20.0 24.0651302605 83% => OK
Preposition: 39.0 41.998997996 93% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1512.0 1615.20841683 94% => OK
No of words: 296.0 315.596192385 94% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.10810810811 5.12529762239 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.14784890444 4.20363070211 99% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.73283874328 2.80592935109 97% => OK
Unique words: 154.0 176.041082164 87% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.52027027027 0.561755894193 93% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 468.0 506.74238477 92% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 6.0 5.43587174349 110% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 2.10420841683 143% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.7716461671 49.4020404114 97% => OK
Chars per sentence: 116.307692308 106.682146367 109% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.7692307692 20.7667163134 110% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.15384615385 7.06120827912 87% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.272781396352 0.244688304435 111% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.101573558 0.084324248473 120% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0408646650496 0.0667982634062 61% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.168843935001 0.151304729494 112% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.053243337716 0.056905535591 94% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.0 13.0946893788 107% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.65 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.14 8.58950901804 95% => OK
difficult_words: 64.0 78.4519038076 82% => More difficult words wanted.
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.