Some young people look forward to a year of traveling, a gap year before they begin work or university, and see it as a chance to broaden their horizons. For others, this is an expensive waste of time. Discuss both views and give your own opinion.
Recently, people have had divergent views about whether ' gap year ' generates opportunities for youngsters to boost their knowledge or just prodigal activity. Some assert that is worthy to pursuit since it gives learners time to think thoroughly about their future majority and develop various personal skills. However, others believe taking a year off is exorbitant and time-consuming. Personally, I gravitate towards the initial opinion as this phenomenon can provide students with time to take consideration and hone social skills.
On one hand, 'Gap year' offers learners a phenomenal chance to take their majority into account before attending to tertiary degree. In a year, the young can travel to contemplate the world as well as explore what they are actually passionate about so that they can choose the proper specialized job. Once, the citizens are interested in their work, in the full-scaled context, this will lead to a reduction in the turnover rate. In addition, travelers are facilitated to improve personal skills such as team-working, communication, problem-solving, and so on which render them more valuable in the recruiter's mindset.
On the contrary, a break year can be pricey and a waste of time. To those who fully make up their mind on what they are literally interested in, taking a year off can backfire and be a huge opportunity cost, let alone the daily basis needs expense and accommodation prices for tourism. The sooner youngsters dive into specialized data, the more well-rounded they obtain. For example, in the hospitality field, it is advisable for employees to be interns as soon as possible since the recruiters likely employ workers who have enough knowledge and experience.
To sum up, a gap year can be advantageous yet it is a stumbling block. However, as it is explicated, I urge the teenagers to take a break year into account if it is feasible.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-05-06 | anh801 | 78 | view |
| 2022-03-26 | linhlinh11 | 73 | view |
| 2022-03-17 | namviet | 67 | view |
| 2022-02-25 | Ngoc Trinh | 89 | view |
| 2021-12-15 | akorn99 | 89 | view |
- The plans below show a student accommodation buildings 2010 and now Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 11
- Many countries import large amounts of food from other parts of the world Is this a positive or negative development 73
- In some countries more and more adults are continuing to live with their parents even after they have completed education and found jobs Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 84
- Many people put their personal information online address telephone number for everyday activities such as socializing on social networks or banking purposes Do you think it is a positive or negative development 89
- The two maps below show Paradise island from the past until now 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 56, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...e have had divergent views about whether gap year generates opportunities for yo...
^^
Line 1, column 66, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
... divergent views about whether gap year generates opportunities for youngsters t...
^^
Line 2, column 597, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[2]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'recruiters'' or 'recruiter's'?
Suggestion: recruiters'; recruiter's
... which render them more valuable in the recruiters mindset. On the contrary, a break year...
^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
actually, however, if, so, well, for example, in addition, such as, as well as, on the contrary, to sum up
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 10.0 10.4138276553 96% => OK
Relative clauses : 5.0 7.30460921844 68% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 22.0 24.0651302605 91% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1587.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 308.0 315.596192385 98% => OK
Chars per words: 5.1525974026 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.18926351222 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.01135444743 2.80592935109 107% => OK
Unique words: 182.0 176.041082164 103% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.590909090909 0.561755894193 105% => OK
syllable_count: 506.7 506.74238477 100% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 6.0 2.52805611222 237% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 8.0 4.76152304609 168% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 14.0 16.0721442886 87% => OK
Sentence length: 22.0 20.2975951904 108% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.1965603209 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 113.357142857 106.682146367 106% => OK
Words per sentence: 22.0 20.7667163134 106% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.57142857143 7.06120827912 107% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 5.0 3.4128256513 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.276261299545 0.244688304435 113% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0891831149162 0.084324248473 106% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0429629334055 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.156037203155 0.151304729494 103% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.04239213886 0.056905535591 74% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.8 13.0946893788 105% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 49.15 50.2224549098 98% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.9 11.3001002004 105% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.59 12.4159519038 101% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.03 8.58950901804 105% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 12.0 9.78957915832 123% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.8 10.1190380762 107% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.