Some people think that in the modern world, getting old is entirely bad. Others, however, think that life of elderly in the modern world is much better than it was in the past. Discuss both views and give your opinion.
In this modern-day life, there is a topic of interest - getting old, which raises concerns to many people. Some people believe that becoming older has an adverse bearing on individuals; however, other ones cite that old people enjoy can have a better life than it was in the past. In this essay, I will explore both opinions before expressing my outlook.
On the one hand, there is a negative facet related to getting old - mass unemployment. The main reason is that the world has been changing and innovating gradually, and also scientists and researchers focus on technological development, especially they allot efforts to automation. They believe that automated machines and processes usher in an era of productivity, which lays a foundation for economic growth. Hence, robotics replaces employers who are senior manual laborers or old workforces to implement labor-intensive tasks, but the automation jeopardizes job security. For instance, most companies and factories, in place of owners will recruit workers to do manual works, they tend to utilize robotic technology to execute work commitments and optimize task productivity. However, high-tech gadget facilitates old people’s life considerably. The old can use robot cleaners and labor-saving machines to do some chores, it not only helps them to save time but also make elderly individuals’ lifetimes more stress-free.
Moreover, thanks to modern technological enhancement, senior people are accessible to familiarize themselves with new knowledge. Firstly, the proliferation of upgraded devices satisfies their entertainment and preference. Statistically speaking, most elderly citizens are inclined to enjoy beautiful sceneries. In the past, if they want to see these sightseeings, they will have to go to these places directly. It deprives the elderly inhabitants of much time. However, nowadays, senior citizens can see landscapes on the Internet and so on at the click of a button. They also can allot time to unwind themselves by watching TV programs. Secondly, older people can get new grasps related to science, policy, and the like. They have high-tech tools at their proposal, search necessary information they need through E-paper, internet-based news, and some videos. For example, if the old like cooking, they can search for some food recipes on media, let alone apply for online culinary courses effortlessly.
To conclude, the elderly people who live in the modern world get upsides vs. downsides. However, I believe that senior citizens have more benefits than disadvantages when they get older in this digital age.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-27 | lilyjuly2002 | 78 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | mandoraaa | 84 | view |
| 2023-08-13 | mandoraaa | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-10 | paula_ngy08 | 89 | view |
| 2021-07-28 | jagrit sharma | 89 | view |
- The bar chart below shows the percentage of Australian men and women in different age groups who did regular physical activity in 2010 78
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can government do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Explain some of the ways in which humans are damaging the environment What can government do to address these problems What can individual people do 89
- Some people believe that nowadays we have too many choices To what extent do you agree or disagree with this opinion 84
- People in many countries are spending less time with their family What are the reasons and effects of this 84
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 366, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ocesses usher in an era of productivity, which lays a foundation for economic gro...
^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, first, firstly, hence, however, if, look, moreover, second, secondly, so, for example, for instance
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 8.0 13.1623246493 61% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 10.0 7.85571142285 127% => OK
Conjunction : 14.0 10.4138276553 134% => OK
Relative clauses : 10.0 7.30460921844 137% => OK
Pronoun: 31.0 24.0651302605 129% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 41.998997996 112% => OK
Nominalization: 13.0 8.3376753507 156% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2205.0 1615.20841683 137% => OK
No of words: 401.0 315.596192385 127% => OK
Chars per words: 5.49875311721 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.47492842339 4.20363070211 106% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.06965442588 2.80592935109 109% => OK
Unique words: 243.0 176.041082164 138% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.605985037406 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 694.8 506.74238477 137% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 10.0 5.43587174349 184% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 4.0 0.809619238477 494% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 22.0 16.0721442886 137% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 42.7824595246 49.4020404114 87% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.227272727 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.2272727273 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.0 7.06120827912 71% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 12.0 8.67935871743 138% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 7.0 3.4128256513 205% => Less facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.20709428694 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.060030425015 0.084324248473 71% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0650473858308 0.0667982634062 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.151517189887 0.151304729494 100% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0739635424858 0.056905535591 130% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.6 13.0946893788 104% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 44.75 50.2224549098 89% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.62 12.4159519038 118% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.77 8.58950901804 114% => OK
difficult_words: 133.0 78.4519038076 170% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.0 9.78957915832 112% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.