Task 2: Some people feel that the government should regulate the level of violence for films of television and cinema. Others feel that violent films should not be released. Discuss both views and give your opinion?
Many people are alert to the detrimental impact of violent movies on broadcast and cinema. While it is argued that movie productions with blood images should be banned, I firmly believe that the national authorities are able to oblige the filmmaker to monitor the degree of the film’s cruelty before being released to the public.
On the one hand, there are various critical reasons why the local governments should discard the violent film from innocent inhabitants as soon as possible, one of which is to restrict violent phenomena in society. It should be noted that many fans of violent movies, particularly children, tend to imitate the film characters who tend to behave rudely rather than kindly and politely, creating more challenges in order to maintain the community safe. For example, there are many intentional shootings after juvenility watches and attempts to mimic protagonists’ actions in American schools.
On the other hand, I realize that controlling the level of violence used in films by official states could be more beneficial than prohibiting them, one of which is to satisfy their viewers. There is no doubt that no one could strictly compel people to watch a particular kind of film in the media. Watchers are likely to choose whatever they prefer to watch, including violent films. Furthermore, they are aware enough that imitating movies could result in dangers for both themselves and the community.
Another crucial reason is that the film crew members need some violent scenes to promote breakthroughs in their plot. They deliberately make their protagonists mature after suffering from all kinds of pain or torment, which mainly aims to educate viewers about a specific moral story instead of encouraging people to copy. If the government disallows filmmakers to produce violent scenes, it will make it difficult to stimulate creativity.
In conclusion, I completely agree that local authorities could regulate the film's violence on media, in terms of enhancing innovation and meeting viewers’ demands, instead of abolishing them, such as limiting violence on society.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-08-30 | luu_nhu@193 | 61 | view |
| 2023-02-08 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-06-18 | abc123@ | 42 | view |
| 2022-03-14 | Lunar Tran | 61 | view |
| 2022-03-12 | Lunar Tran | 89 | view |
- Fossil fuel is the main source of energy In some countries the use of alternative sources of energy is encouraged To what extent do you think is it a positive or negative development 84
- Some people think that newspapers are the best way to learn news However others believe that they can learn news better through other media Discuss both views and give your own opinion Give reasons for your answer and include any relevant examples from yo 67
- Task 1 The chart shows the results of surveys in one African country asking teenagers the main reasons for using their phones between 2016 and 2019 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- Some people think that teachers should be responsible for teaching students to judge what is right and wrong so that they can behave well Others say that teachers should only teach students academic subjects Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Some people work for the same organization all their working life Others think that it is better to work for different organizations Discuss both these views and give your own opinion 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 5, column 78, Rule ID: POSSESIVE_APOSTROPHE[1]
Message: Possible typo: apostrophe is missing. Did you mean 'films'' or 'film's'?
Suggestion: films'; film's
...at local authorities could regulate the films violence on media, in terms of enhancin...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
furthermore, if, so, while, for example, in conclusion, kind of, no doubt, such as, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 15.0 13.1623246493 114% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 9.0 7.85571142285 115% => OK
Conjunction : 6.0 10.4138276553 58% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 12.0 7.30460921844 164% => OK
Pronoun: 24.0 24.0651302605 100% => OK
Preposition: 51.0 41.998997996 121% => OK
Nominalization: 6.0 8.3376753507 72% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1779.0 1615.20841683 110% => OK
No of words: 334.0 315.596192385 106% => OK
Chars per words: 5.32634730539 5.12529762239 104% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.27500489853 4.20363070211 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.78019928238 2.80592935109 99% => OK
Unique words: 201.0 176.041082164 114% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.601796407186 0.561755894193 107% => OK
syllable_count: 556.2 506.74238477 110% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 0.0 2.52805611222 0% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 5.0 4.76152304609 105% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 13.0 16.0721442886 81% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 25.0 20.2975951904 123% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 56.9225571702 49.4020404114 115% => OK
Chars per sentence: 136.846153846 106.682146367 128% => OK
Words per sentence: 25.6923076923 20.7667163134 124% => OK
Discourse Markers: 7.76923076923 7.06120827912 110% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 1.0 5.01903807615 20% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 2.0 8.67935871743 23% => More positive sentences wanted.
Sentences with negative sentiment : 10.0 3.9879759519 251% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.268738919142 0.244688304435 110% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0833540990255 0.084324248473 99% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0419252750152 0.0667982634062 63% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.134953240619 0.151304729494 89% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0333682174757 0.056905535591 59% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 16.5 13.0946893788 126% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.64 50.2224549098 75% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 14.2 11.3001002004 126% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 13.93 12.4159519038 112% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.17 8.58950901804 118% => OK
difficult_words: 112.0 78.4519038076 143% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 14.0 9.78957915832 143% => OK
gunning_fog: 12.0 10.1190380762 119% => OK
text_standard: 14.0 10.7795591182 130% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.