The graph shows the number of marriages and divorces in the UK between 1975 and 2000.
The line graph gives the information about the quantity of British people who got married and divorced from 1975 to 2000.
Overall, the proportion of first marriges in the UK decreased slightly, whereas the figures for the other three increased minimally over the period shown.
In 1975, there was nearly 500 thousand people in Britain getting married in total. Among them, there were approximate 350 thousand of couples who got married for the first time. The next 10 years from 1975 to 1985 winessed a signifficant soar in the number of first and total marriages. Over the next 15 years, there was a fluctuation in the proportion of first and total marriages. However, while the first mariages had a tendency of declining to the end of the perior mentioned, the figures for total mariages went up considerably over the years shown.
Turning to rate of the second marriages and divorces which continually surged over the years mentioned. The quantity of people who divorced in the UK stood at the lowest in comparison with the other three. The figures climbed up signifficantly and overtook the proportion of the second marriges until the two ones ended up at nearly the same number of nearly 250 thousand in the finaly year of the period shown.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-14 | Zahid6400 | 67 | view |
| 2023-09-25 | kashyap sahil | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
| 2023-09-07 | abid1 | view | |
| 2023-07-30 | Mike-Huang | 78 | view |
- how the elderly in the US spent their free time from 1980 to 2010 61
- The graph below gives information from a 2008 report about consumption of energy in the USA since 1980 with projections until 2030 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant Write at least 15 73
- The chart below shows the percentage of the day working adults spent doing different activities in a particular country in 1958 and in 2008 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The chart illustrates consumption of three kinds of fast food by teenagers in Mauritius from 1985 to 2015 Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 73
- The table describes the changes of people who went for international travel in 1990 1995 2000 and 2005 million Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, however, if, second, so, whereas, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 3.0 7.0 43% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 3.15609756098 127% => OK
Pronoun: 1.0 5.60731707317 18% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 33.7804878049 118% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 3.97073170732 126% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1040.0 965.302439024 108% => OK
No of words: 212.0 196.424390244 108% => OK
Chars per words: 4.90566037736 4.92477711251 100% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.81578560438 3.73543355544 102% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.59198864318 2.65546596893 98% => OK
Unique words: 105.0 106.607317073 98% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.495283018868 0.547539520022 90% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 308.7 283.868780488 109% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.5 1.45097560976 103% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 0.0 1.53170731707 0% => OK
Article: 6.0 4.33902439024 138% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 1.07073170732 93% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.482926829268 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 3.36585365854 89% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 10.0 8.94146341463 112% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 22.4926829268 93% => OK
Sentence length SD: 37.9557637257 43.030603864 88% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.0 112.824112599 92% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.2 22.9334400587 92% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.6 5.23603664747 88% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 3.0 3.70975609756 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 6.0 4.09268292683 147% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.162827189797 0.215688989381 75% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0667840273686 0.103423049105 65% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.064304131949 0.0843802449381 76% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.108574927558 0.15604864568 70% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0681597537877 0.0819641961636 83% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.3 13.2329268293 93% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 58.62 61.2550243902 96% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 10.3012195122 100% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 11.2 11.4140731707 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.18 8.06136585366 101% => OK
difficult_words: 47.0 40.7170731707 115% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.0 11.4329268293 70% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.9970731707 95% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 11.0658536585 99% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 67.4157303371 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.