Nuclear energy is the best source of power for today’s global energy needs. To what extent do you agree or disagree?
These days, it is argued that the optimal source of energy satisfying global demands is nuclear power. I completely agree with this statement because several benefits are offered.
To begin with, nuclear energy provides people with higher productivity compared to other sources. To be specific, a nuclear factory has the ability to generate power that meets demands of numerous households. For example, a French nuclear plant could supply electricity for at least 3 cities using a small amount of plutonium. Moreover, this type of source could be more reliable as it is independent of weather conditions. The process of producing electricity by nuclear power occurs in a station, so it is not affected by wind, sun or rain. In contrast, wind turbines are not efficient in milder weather and solar energy could not be utilised in rains. It seems that nuclear energy is the most effective method to produce electricity, heat or other power.
Despite these advantages, some people still claim that nuclear power is not as good as others argue. They may think the generation of this source releases CO2 emissions to the atmosphere which leads to greenhouse effects. However, I personally believe it is one of the most eco-friendly powers. Particularly, nuclear energy is produced by splitting atoms instead of burning fuel, therefore it is almost zero-emissions. Some research papers show that nuclear energy helped humans avoid nearly 63 tonnes of CO2 discharged from 1971 to 2018. On the other hand, the process of burning charcoal or gas emits several tonnes of CO2 emissions annually. Clearly, nuclear power has done much less damage to the environment as opposed to fuels.
To conclude, although some people still doubt the role of nuclear energy in human life, I am of the view that it is the most effective power as it has a higher level of productivity, is more reliable and does not pollute the environment as much as other sources.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-06-05 | Cicihg | 61 | view |
| 2020-11-24 | driverhiepkhachvnteam | 78 | view |
| 2018-08-31 | Ajayvir | 92 | view |
| 2018-08-28 | drtruong92 | 57 | view |
- The charts below show the internet use in different purposes in Australia in 2010 2011 and the percentage by users Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 89
- TOPIC Many museums charge for admission while others are free Do the advantages of this outweigh the disadvantages 73
- At the present time the population of some countries includes a relatively large number of young adults compared with the number of older people Do the advantages of this situation outweigh the disadvantages 73
- The line graph shows the global demand of different types of textile from 1980 to 2015 67
- The chart below shows the results of a survey about people s coffee and tea buying and drinking habits in five Australian cities Summaries the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
however, if, may, moreover, so, still, therefore, at least, for example, in contrast, to begin with, on the other hand
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 16.0 13.1623246493 122% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 4.0 7.85571142285 51% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 10.4138276553 48% => More conjunction wanted.
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 23.0 24.0651302605 96% => OK
Preposition: 41.0 41.998997996 98% => OK
Nominalization: 5.0 8.3376753507 60% => More nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1631.0 1615.20841683 101% => OK
No of words: 321.0 315.596192385 102% => OK
Chars per words: 5.08099688474 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.23278547379 4.20363070211 101% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.74386751151 2.80592935109 98% => OK
Unique words: 175.0 176.041082164 99% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.545171339564 0.561755894193 97% => OK
syllable_count: 513.9 506.74238477 101% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 8.0 5.43587174349 147% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 6.0 4.76152304609 126% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 39.9517875535 49.4020404114 81% => OK
Chars per sentence: 95.9411764706 106.682146367 90% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.8823529412 20.7667163134 91% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.94117647059 7.06120827912 98% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 9.0 8.67935871743 104% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 4.0 3.9879759519 100% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.267045202709 0.244688304435 109% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0853771545016 0.084324248473 101% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0630472659028 0.0667982634062 94% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.172204321113 0.151304729494 114% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0519825355923 0.056905535591 91% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 11.9 13.0946893788 91% => Automated_readability_index is low.
flesch_reading_ease: 53.21 50.2224549098 106% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.3 11.3001002004 91% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.71 8.58950901804 101% => OK
difficult_words: 85.0 78.4519038076 108% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 7.0 9.78957915832 72% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 61.797752809 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 5.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.