Many manufactured food and drink products contain high levels of sugar, which causes many health problems. Sugary products should be made more expensive to encourage people to consume less sugar. Do you agree or disagree?
There has been a colossal upsurge in prodigies discussing the topic of the danger of the excessive sweet additives in manufactured food and the methods to prevent this phenomenon. Although some people contend that these products should be put at a higher price, I personally opine that we can alter to another solution to deter this issue. These methods will be scrutinized in this essay before reaching my rational conclusion.
First and foremost, parents and educational institutions should teach the children about the potential danger of produced food. This action can raise children's awareness and help them know the nutrition of their food intake on a daily basis. Secondly, government and authorities can impose strict rules about the volume of sugar permission in food and drink. In this regard, the company needs to comply with the policy and adjust the suitable amount of sugar they put in their products. Thirdly, people should organize more programs and campaigns which are related to anti-sugar packs and show more about the negative effect of sugar on our bodies. For instance, some surveys in the US illustrated the risk of sugar-packed such as obesity, and diarrhea,... to help people recognize the repercussion of this trend and stay away from it.
Considering the diverse effect of raising the price of sugar products, this can cause rampant inflation in the economy because manufactured food and drink can be seen as the underlying supplies in our lives. Moreover, not every sugar product can influence adversely our development if we just use this in the recommended amount. Furthermore, sugar is proven to be an ingredient that can reduce people's stress and boost energy. It is undoubted that increasing the price of sugar products can bring disadvantages to the producer and the consumer. That's why we need to have alternative methods instead of applying this policy in the market.
In conclusion, it is hardly unaccepted that sugar is not as harmful as we thought and sometimes it is beneficial for our health if we just use it in moderation. I wholeheartedly disagree with the above statement and assume that there is a range of solutions for us to mitigate this negative trend.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-09-06 | mrsaidovs@mail.ru | 84 | view |
| 2024-08-22 | ThHuong | 78 | view |
| 2024-08-05 | MEBC Class | view | |
| 2024-02-22 | Elahe13 | 78 | view |
| 2024-01-01 | Ahmad_off | 56 | view |
- The only way to reduce the amount of traffic in cities to day is by reducing the need for people to travel from home for work education or shopping To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The pictures below show the process of making clothes from recycled plastic bottles 78
- The diagrams below show the existing ground floor plan of a house and a proposed plan for some building work 78
- Rich countries often give money to poorer countries but it does not solve poverty Therefore developed countries should give other types of help to the poor countries rather than financial aid To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
- The picture below shows how a hot balloon works Summarize the information by selecting and reporting the main features 61
Comments
Essay evaluations by e-grader
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...gar-packed such as obesity, and diarrhea,... to help people recognize the repercus...
^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...tages to the producer and the consumer. Thats why we need to have alternative methods...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07713498623 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82095009036 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559228650138 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7918521741 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216253223259 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703748427841 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048043717309 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124470762292 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475658085731 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 752, Rule ID: COMMA_PARENTHESIS_WHITESPACE
Message: Put a space after the comma
Suggestion: , .
...gar-packed such as obesity, and diarrhea,... to help people recognize the repercus...
^^
Line 3, column 545, Rule ID: EN_CONTRACTION_SPELLING
Message: Possible spelling mistake found
Suggestion: That's
...tages to the producer and the consumer. Thats why we need to have alternative methods...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
first, furthermore, if, moreover, second, secondly, so, third, thirdly, for instance, in conclusion, such as
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 12.0 13.1623246493 91% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 13.0 7.85571142285 165% => OK
Conjunction : 16.0 10.4138276553 154% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 41.0 24.0651302605 170% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 9.0 8.3376753507 108% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1843.0 1615.20841683 114% => OK
No of words: 363.0 315.596192385 115% => OK
Chars per words: 5.07713498623 5.12529762239 99% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.3649236973 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.82095009036 2.80592935109 101% => OK
Unique words: 203.0 176.041082164 115% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.559228650138 0.561755894193 100% => OK
syllable_count: 582.3 506.74238477 115% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 1.0 2.52805611222 40% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 1.0 0.809619238477 124% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 17.0 16.0721442886 106% => OK
Sentence length: 21.0 20.2975951904 103% => OK
Sentence length SD: 33.7918521741 49.4020404114 68% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.411764706 106.682146367 102% => OK
Words per sentence: 21.3529411765 20.7667163134 103% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.35294117647 7.06120827912 90% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 2.0 5.01903807615 40% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 6.0 8.67935871743 69% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 7.0 3.9879759519 176% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.216253223259 0.244688304435 88% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0703748427841 0.084324248473 83% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.048043717309 0.0667982634062 72% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.124470762292 0.151304729494 82% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0475658085731 0.056905535591 84% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 13.2 13.0946893788 101% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 50.16 50.2224549098 100% => OK
smog_index: 8.8 7.44779559118 118% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.5 11.3001002004 102% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.18 12.4159519038 98% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.38 8.58950901804 109% => OK
difficult_words: 108.0 78.4519038076 138% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 11.5 9.78957915832 117% => OK
gunning_fog: 10.4 10.1190380762 103% => OK
text_standard: 12.0 10.7795591182 111% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.