The chart below gives information about the age of women in Australia when they gave birth to their first child in 1966, 1986, and 2006.
The chart compares the proportion of different ages of Australian women with their first-time pregnancies in 1966, 1986, and 2006.
It is clear that the percentage of women over 40 was the most modest among the six age groups. Furthermore, while the data for women giving birth to their first child from 25 to over 40 showed an upward trend, the figures for the age groups under 19 and 19-24 experienced a downward trend.
Starting at nearly 35% in 1966, the data for the women under 19 witnessed a decrease to just above one-tenth of the total proportion in 2006. Likewise, although the pattern for females aged between 19 and 24 was the highest figure recorded in 1966 (around 63%), there was a fall of 26% in 1986 followed by a drop to just under 30% at the end of this period.
A similar pattern is observed in the changes of data for the 30-34 and 34-39 age groups during this period, which increased to around 45% and 30% respectively, in 2006. Similarly, there were also slightly more women over 40 giving birth to their first child over the years, while the data for women aged 25-30 experienced a fluctuation, rising from around 35% in 1966 to 50% in 1986 before a drop to just under 40% in 2006.
Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
---|---|---|---|
2023-07-07 | baoquyen1906 | 89 | view |
2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
2023-05-19 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
2023-05-06 | letrang250191 | 73 | view |
2023-05-02 | letrang250191 | 67 | view |
- In some countries men and women are having children late in life What are the reasons for this development Do the advantages of this outweigh its disadvantages 73
- The diagram below shows the process for recycling plastic bottles Summarise the information by selecting and reporting the main features and make comparisons where relevant 78
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 73
- Some people say that the government should spend more money taking care of elderly people while others think that government spending should be spent more on the education of young people Discuss both views and give your opinion 73
- some people believe that it is best to accept a bad situation such as an unsatisfactory job or shortage of money Other argue that it is better to try and improve such situations Discuss both views and give opinions 67
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, first, furthermore, if, likewise, similarly, so, while
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 7.0 86% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 0.0 1.00243902439 0% => OK
Conjunction : 5.0 6.8 74% => OK
Relative clauses : 2.0 3.15609756098 63% => OK
Pronoun: 7.0 5.60731707317 125% => Less pronouns wanted
Preposition: 47.0 33.7804878049 139% => OK
Nominalization: 3.0 3.97073170732 76% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 996.0 965.302439024 103% => OK
No of words: 219.0 196.424390244 111% => OK
Chars per words: 4.54794520548 4.92477711251 92% => OK
Fourth root words length: 3.84690116678 3.73543355544 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.40689085327 2.65546596893 91% => OK
Unique words: 113.0 106.607317073 106% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.51598173516 0.547539520022 94% => More unique words wanted or less content wanted.
syllable_count: 275.4 283.868780488 97% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.3 1.45097560976 90% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 1.0 1.53170731707 65% => OK
Article: 4.0 4.33902439024 92% => OK
Subordination: 3.0 1.07073170732 280% => Less adverbial clause wanted.
Conjunction: 1.0 0.482926829268 207% => Less conjunction wanted as sentence beginning.
Preposition: 1.0 3.36585365854 30% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 7.0 8.94146341463 78% => Need more sentences. Double check the format of sentences, make sure there is a space between two sentences, or have enough periods. And also check the lengths of sentences, maybe they are too long.
Sentence length: 31.0 22.4926829268 138% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively long.
Sentence length SD: 50.2844967385 43.030603864 117% => OK
Chars per sentence: 142.285714286 112.824112599 126% => OK
Words per sentence: 31.2857142857 22.9334400587 136% => OK
Discourse Markers: 8.57142857143 5.23603664747 164% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 3.83414634146 104% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 1.69756097561 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 4.0 3.70975609756 108% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 1.13902439024 88% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 2.0 4.09268292683 49% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.27403647249 0.215688989381 127% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.146620337671 0.103423049105 142% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0985740074431 0.0843802449381 117% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.202457363881 0.15604864568 130% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0811578253306 0.0819641961636 99% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.6 13.2329268293 118% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 65.39 61.2550243902 107% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 6.51609756098 48% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 11.8 10.3012195122 115% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 9.7 11.4140731707 85% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 7.77 8.06136585366 96% => OK
difficult_words: 36.0 40.7170731707 88% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 13.0 11.4329268293 114% => OK
gunning_fog: 14.4 10.9970731707 131% => OK
text_standard: 8.0 11.0658536585 72% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 73.0337078652 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 6.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.