We are witnessing traffic jams all across the cities in the world Some people say that increasing prices of petrol will help in reducing traffic jams and pollution Do you agree or disagree Also give other possible solutions

Humanity is facing major traffic jams across all the towns in the globe. A number of individuals argued that a rise in the rates of gasoline would contribute in the decreasing traffic jams and pollution. In the forthcoming paragraphs, i will highlight my agreement which inclined to words the statement following with some other measures to contribute the commute system of the world.
To commence with, several justifications can be placed in favour of my agreement. Firstly, due to a rise in oil prices middle class would not be able to use the way girls much and therefore it would help in clearing the streets from cars and bikes. secondly it would encourage people to use public transportation for long distances because it is cheaper than a private vehicle, however for short distances individuals can use bicycles and walking. Meanwhile, they will be able to reach their location and would enhance their physic.
Numerous solutions can be attributed for the rising traffic and urban centres. Firstly, promote the benefits of electric vehicles. The modern world is evolving and improving day by day, therefore we can not stick to the old fossil fuels, where should increase the production of electric vehicles and spread awareness regarding them. So that, individuals willingly shift to them. Electric vehicles do not emit any kind of pollution, comparatively to the diesel. Secondly, government can increase taxes on diesel engine and provide subsidies for the Electronic ones. so that people can buy them for commuting more at a cheaper cost and then it can benefit a large number of population. Thus, it will significantly reduce traffic and pollution from earth.
To conclude, I agree that rising the fuel prices will help in managing the traffic, subsequently shifting to electric engines and spreading awareness regarding the benefits of them will improve the pollution levels and traffic on the streets.

Votes
Average: 7.8 (1 vote)
Essays by the user:

Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 1, column 236, Rule ID: I_LOWERCASE[2]
Message: Did you mean 'I'?
Suggestion: I
...llution. In the forthcoming paragraphs, i will highlight my agreement which incli...
^
Line 1, column 284, Rule ID: TO_NON_BASE[1]
Message: The verb after "to" should be in the base form: 'word'.
Suggestion: word
...ighlight my agreement which inclined to words the statement following with some other...
^^^^^
Line 1, column 353, Rule ID: A_INFINITVE[1]
Message: Probably a wrong construction: a/the + infinitive
... with some other measures to contribute the commute system of the world. To commence with,...
^^^^^^^^^^^
Line 2, column 249, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: Secondly
...earing the streets from cars and bikes. secondly it would encourage people to use public...
^^^^^^^^
Line 3, column 566, Rule ID: UPPERCASE_SENTENCE_START
Message: This sentence does not start with an uppercase letter
Suggestion: So
...vide subsidies for the Electronic ones. so that people can buy them for commuting ...
^^
Line 3, column 655, Rule ID: LARGE_NUMBER_OF[1]
Message: Specify a number, remove phrase, or simply use 'many' or 'numerous'
Suggestion: many; numerous
... a cheaper cost and then it can benefit a large number of population. Thus, it will significantly...
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^

Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, first, firstly, however, if, regarding, second, secondly, so, then, therefore, thus, while, kind of

Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments

Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 7.0 13.1623246493 53% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 18.0 7.85571142285 229% => Less auxiliary verb wanted.
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 6.0 7.30460921844 82% => OK
Pronoun: 21.0 24.0651302605 87% => OK
Preposition: 40.0 41.998997996 95% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK

Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1609.0 1615.20841683 100% => OK
No of words: 311.0 315.596192385 99% => OK
Chars per words: 5.17363344051 5.12529762239 101% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.19942759058 4.20363070211 100% => OK
Word Length SD: 2.80937317211 2.80592935109 100% => OK
Unique words: 178.0 176.041082164 101% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.572347266881 0.561755894193 102% => OK
syllable_count: 497.7 506.74238477 98% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.6 1.60771543086 100% => OK

A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 4.0 5.43587174349 74% => OK
Article: 2.0 2.52805611222 79% => OK
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK

Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 58.6854698797 49.4020404114 119% => OK
Chars per sentence: 100.5625 106.682146367 94% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.4375 20.7667163134 94% => OK
Discourse Markers: 6.5 7.06120827912 92% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 6.0 5.01903807615 120% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 11.0 8.67935871743 127% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 1.0 3.9879759519 25% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 4.0 3.4128256513 117% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?

Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.226124723916 0.244688304435 92% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0718289215526 0.084324248473 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0701284847927 0.0667982634062 105% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.146718970479 0.151304729494 97% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0728823500394 0.056905535591 128% => OK

Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 12.6 13.0946893788 96% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 52.19 50.2224549098 104% => OK
smog_index: 3.1 7.44779559118 42% => Smog_index is low.
flesch_kincaid_grade: 10.7 11.3001002004 95% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 12.71 12.4159519038 102% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 8.84 8.58950901804 103% => OK
difficult_words: 84.0 78.4519038076 107% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 13.0 10.7795591182 121% => OK
What are above readability scores?

---------------------

Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.