Some people think it is more important to spend money on roads and motorways than on public transport systems. To what extend do you agree?
Some argue that the position of different types of roads is more important than public transport systems. In my opinion, money should be allocated in both.
Public transport network would relieve density of private vehicles on roads which is the main culprits of traffic congestion and air pollution. As living standard of people has witnessed increasing improvement in recent decades, number personal vehicle ownership also rises simultaneously. The quantity of vehicles would eventually outnumber the capacity of the existing highways and road system that results in traffic jams and accidents. Likewise, the operation of private vehicles which depends greatly on burning fossil fuel which accounts for the majority of carbon emission in metropolitan areas. Thus, investment in public facilities supporting public vehicles would have positive impacts on the traffic and nature.
Nevertheless, the role of roads designed for automobiles, motorbikes are also significant. It facilitates the smooth movement of vehicles which encourage the exchange of goods and shorten the delivery time. This contributes enormously to the productivy and efficiency of national economy, which is a sign of a prosperous and wealthy country. More importantly, state-of-the-art transportation infrastructure is a fundamental element to attract foreign investment. The overseas financial source would ecourage the development of other factors within countries including more employment opportunities, industrial expansion, management procedure, especially the less developed ones. These would pave the way for the further growth of a country.
In sum, road and public transport network benefit people in different ways. Government should therefore manage national fund to construct roads and public transport infrastructure in oder to meet the needs of both.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-06-18 | Huyenlbg87 | 89 | view |
| 2023-02-01 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-12-07 | thanhtu000 | 78 | view |
| 2022-09-10 | Charles Le | 78 | view |
| 2022-05-14 | paulha1107 | 73 | view |
- Nowadays people use bicycles less as a form of transport Why is that What can we do to encourage people to use bicycles more 84
- Some people think that all teenagers should be required to do unpaid work in their free time to help the local community They believe this would benefit both the individual teenager and society as a whole Do you agree or disagree 84
- Some people say team sports football have lots of benefits Others say Individual sports swimming tennis are better Discuss both views and give your opinion 84
- Today children and teenagers are committing more crimes Why is this case How should they be punished 84
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 84
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, if, likewise, nevertheless, so, therefore, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 6.0 13.1623246493 46% => More to be verbs wanted.
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 9.0 10.4138276553 86% => OK
Relative clauses : 7.0 7.30460921844 96% => OK
Pronoun: 6.0 24.0651302605 25% => OK
Preposition: 35.0 41.998997996 83% => OK
Nominalization: 14.0 8.3376753507 168% => OK
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1575.0 1615.20841683 98% => OK
No of words: 266.0 315.596192385 84% => More content wanted.
Chars per words: 5.92105263158 5.12529762239 116% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.03850299372 4.20363070211 96% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.13856643111 2.80592935109 112% => OK
Unique words: 164.0 176.041082164 93% => More unique words wanted.
Unique words percentage: 0.616541353383 0.561755894193 110% => OK
syllable_count: 487.8 506.74238477 96% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 4.0 2.52805611222 158% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 2.0 4.76152304609 42% => More preposition wanted as sentence beginning.
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 15.0 16.0721442886 93% => OK
Sentence length: 17.0 20.2975951904 84% => The Avg. Sentence Length is relatively short.
Sentence length SD: 40.804683827 49.4020404114 83% => OK
Chars per sentence: 105.0 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 17.7333333333 20.7667163134 85% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.86666666667 7.06120827912 69% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 10.0 8.67935871743 115% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 2.0 3.9879759519 50% => More negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.208434523943 0.244688304435 85% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0711185563243 0.084324248473 84% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0825892094936 0.0667982634062 124% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.152797638182 0.151304729494 101% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0859282625517 0.056905535591 151% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 15.3 13.0946893788 117% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 37.3 50.2224549098 74% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.3 11.3001002004 109% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.76 12.4159519038 135% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.77 8.58950901804 125% => OK
difficult_words: 106.0 78.4519038076 135% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 8.5 9.78957915832 87% => OK
gunning_fog: 8.8 10.1190380762 87% => OK
text_standard: 9.0 10.7795591182 83% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 78.6516853933 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.