Machines are replacing humans in the manual workforce. Do you think the positive effects outweigh the negative effects?
The role of technology is becoming increasingly significant in the recent years. With the help of robots and automation, labor-intensive work is succumbing to machines and modern equipment. In my opinion, the merits of the phenomenom would completely overshadow their drawbacks.
Machine helps to boost productivity and the efficiency of businesses in many ways.
First, given technological advancement, machines nowadays are optimized for repetitive work, they can perform with great accuracy and speed compared to their human counterparts. This subsequently result in improvement in productivity of individual organisations and the output of nations as a whole. Additionaly, jobs that often require exposure to either dangerous or harzadous environment would seen less involment of human workers which alliviates the risk of injuries and toxication for workers. As a consequence, safe workplaces provide people with a sense of job security and satisfaction. Finally, replacing people by robots in manual work also implies the less impacts of unwanted issues associated with human factor because machines do not demand salary raise, perks, allowances and so forth. Thus, use of machines in manual jobs give company a wide range of advantages.
Another major benifit of using state-of-the-art machinery is that workers are relieved of physical work and encourages the development of knowledge-based economy. The first point in support of this view is that when machines are utilized, the total working hours of a certain country would be reduced simultaneously. Due to this, the general workforce may enjoy extra leisure time. Furthermore, as machines and automation dominate over human beings at work, people then have to to take part in vocational training or higher education to adapt to the new environment. The movement in turn motivates the enhancement of the workforce within countries which makes these nations appealing to foreign investment, a precedessor for the growth of a country. By deploying new technology to replace human wokers, not only the wage-earners themselves but the nation would be benefited.
In sum, new types of machines and devices when used would act as a catalyst for the success of firms and nations. That is why I believe this trend is a positive development.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2023-03-08 | tieuquynh | 89 | view |
| 2022-09-27 | Charles Le | 90 | view |
| 2021-10-26 | Phương_TS13 | 78 | view |
| 2020-12-27 | Mandeep khokhar | 84 | view |
| 2019-09-28 | oceanyang | 89 | view |
- The most important function of music is that it helps people reduce stress To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- Environmental damage is a problem in most countries What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility 89
- Technology has changed the way children spend their free time Do the advantages outweigh the disadvantages 89
- Many people depend on their cars for everyday domestic social and working needs However unlimited use of cars causes a number of problems What are some of these problems What can be done to reduce the use of cars 84
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 3, column 398, Rule ID: PRP_PAST_PART[2]
Message: Did you mean 'have seen' or 'see'?
Suggestion: have seen; see
...angerous or harzadous environment would seen less involment of human workers which a...
^^^^
Line 3, column 665, Rule ID: FEWER_LESS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'fewer'? The noun impacts is countable.
Suggestion: fewer
... robots in manual work also implies the less impacts of unwanted issues associated w...
^^^^
Line 4, column 475, Rule ID: ENGLISH_WORD_REPEAT_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a word
Suggestion: to
... human beings at work, people then have to to take part in vocational training or hig...
^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, furthermore, if, may, so, then, thus, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 7.0 7.85571142285 89% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 15.0 24.0651302605 62% => OK
Preposition: 53.0 41.998997996 126% => OK
Nominalization: 17.0 8.3376753507 204% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1944.0 1615.20841683 120% => OK
No of words: 355.0 315.596192385 112% => OK
Chars per words: 5.47605633803 5.12529762239 107% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.34067318298 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.18799822335 2.80592935109 114% => OK
Unique words: 218.0 176.041082164 124% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.614084507042 0.561755894193 109% => OK
syllable_count: 621.9 506.74238477 123% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 4.0 4.76152304609 84% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 18.0 16.0721442886 112% => OK
Sentence length: 19.0 20.2975951904 94% => OK
Sentence length SD: 47.3800304343 49.4020404114 96% => OK
Chars per sentence: 108.0 106.682146367 101% => OK
Words per sentence: 19.7222222222 20.7667163134 95% => OK
Discourse Markers: 4.33333333333 7.06120827912 61% => OK
Paragraphs: 5.0 4.38176352705 114% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 14.0 8.67935871743 161% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 3.0 3.9879759519 75% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 1.0 3.4128256513 29% => More facts, knowledge or examples wanted.
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.151220965423 0.244688304435 62% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0419143315031 0.084324248473 50% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0370331818636 0.0667982634062 55% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0714461827321 0.151304729494 47% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0360461013714 0.056905535591 63% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.2 13.0946893788 108% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 35.27 50.2224549098 70% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.1 11.3001002004 116% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 14.5 12.4159519038 117% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 9.96 8.58950901804 116% => OK
difficult_words: 121.0 78.4519038076 154% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 9.0 9.78957915832 92% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.6 10.1190380762 95% => OK
text_standard: 10.0 10.7795591182 93% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.