Some people believe that to prevent illness and disease, governments should focus more on environmental pollution and housing problems. To some extent do you agree or disagree?
The healh of the general population is of great concern to many people. Some suggest that political leaders can safeguard their citizens by investing in resolving environmental and housing issuese. In my opinion, this viewpoint is partly right because prevention of sicknesses should be initialy come from the improvement in the medical industry.
It is understandably why some persons motivate the interference of governments in preservation of environment and control the housing market. The former approach eliminates the impact of the environmental factor on the public health. Mitigation of emission from vehicles and plants, decrease in carbon footprint, deployment of new eco-friendly energy and so forth help alliviate pollution of human’s habitat, which is the main cuprit of many detrimental effects causing people’s related health issues. For example, the utilization of electric vehicles would cut the use of fossil fuel and reduce the amount of gas emission in the air which people inhaled, thereby ameliorating the risk of contracting illnesses associating with the respiratory system. Secondly, the lack of accommodation is another contribution to many healh problems of individuals. If people are not able to afford living in a home, they would be prone to the shifts of weather such as rain, high temperature or snow. Exceesive exposure to these factors would gradually deteriorate the well-being of imporerished people and make their sickness become uncurable.
Apart from solving environmental negative effects and shortage of houses, degradation of the public health should receive immediate attention from the authorities. Even though government’s intervention in protecting the environment and housing market could curb the long-term impact of these problems on their citizen, the need to improve public health seems more urgent. The creation of new medicines and treatments could help millions of people reduce their pain and avoid deathly diseases such as HIV or cancers. Likewise, Government’s funding in medical sector could help to enhance necessary facilities including equipment of state-of-the-art machines, constructing new hospitals and raising living standard of medical workers. The combination of these method should be prioritized to solve the more pressing problem which is the impact on the healh of many patients.
In sum, governments should combine their solutions to alliviate the drawbacks of healh issues on their inhabitants.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022-10-14 | Charles Le | 89 | view |
| 2022-10-09 | Charles Le | 84 | view |
- Big salary is much more important than job satisfaction Do you agree or disagree Provide relevant examples if necessary 84
- Parents should encourage children to spend less time studying and more time doing physical activities To what extent do you agree or disagree 78
- It is a natural process for animal species to become extinct There is no reason why people should try to prevent this from happening Do you agree or disagree 78
- Some people say that increasing fuel costs could reduce environmental problems do you agree or disagree 89
- It is more important to spend public money on promoting a healthy lifestyle in order to prevent illness than to spend it on the treatment of people who are already ill To what extent do you agree or disagree 73
Grammar and spelling errors:
Line 2, column 67, Rule ID: WHITESPACE_RULE
Message: Possible typo: you repeated a whitespace
Suggestion:
...ome persons motivate the interference of governments in preservation of environme...
^^
Line 2, column 885, Rule ID: AFFORD_VBG[1]
Message: This verb is used with infinitive: 'to live'.
Suggestion: to live
...duals. If people are not able to afford living in a home, they would be prone to the s...
^^^^^^
Line 3, column 753, Rule ID: THIS_NNS[2]
Message: Did you mean 'this method' or 'these methods'?
Suggestion: this method; these methods
... of medical workers. The combination of these method should be prioritized to solve the more...
^^^^^^^^^^^^
Transition Words or Phrases used:
but, if, likewise, second, secondly, so, well, apart from, for example, such as, in my opinion
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 11.0 13.1623246493 84% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 12.0 7.85571142285 153% => OK
Conjunction : 13.0 10.4138276553 125% => OK
Relative clauses : 4.0 7.30460921844 55% => More relative clauses wanted.
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 58.0 41.998997996 138% => OK
Nominalization: 20.0 8.3376753507 240% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 2111.0 1615.20841683 131% => OK
No of words: 370.0 315.596192385 117% => OK
Chars per words: 5.70540540541 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.38581623665 4.20363070211 104% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.12844696673 2.80592935109 111% => OK
Unique words: 217.0 176.041082164 123% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.586486486486 0.561755894193 104% => OK
syllable_count: 644.4 506.74238477 127% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.7 1.60771543086 106% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 3.0 5.43587174349 55% => OK
Article: 7.0 2.52805611222 277% => Less articles wanted as sentence beginning.
Subordination: 2.0 2.10420841683 95% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 16.0 16.0721442886 100% => OK
Sentence length: 23.0 20.2975951904 113% => OK
Sentence length SD: 54.3593368245 49.4020404114 110% => OK
Chars per sentence: 131.9375 106.682146367 124% => OK
Words per sentence: 23.125 20.7667163134 111% => OK
Discourse Markers: 5.875 7.06120827912 83% => OK
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 3.0 5.01903807615 60% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 8.0 8.67935871743 92% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 5.0 3.9879759519 125% => OK
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.198454091935 0.244688304435 81% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0580948417987 0.084324248473 69% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0386109041058 0.0667982634062 58% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.109913562012 0.151304729494 73% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0282786529103 0.056905535591 50% => Paragraphs are similar to each other. Some content may get duplicated or it is not exactly right on the topic.
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 17.0 13.0946893788 130% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 39.67 50.2224549098 79% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 13.4 11.3001002004 119% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 16.13 12.4159519038 130% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.41 8.58950901804 121% => OK
difficult_words: 132.0 78.4519038076 168% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 11.2 10.1190380762 111% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 84.2696629213 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 7.5 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.