Environmental damage is a problem in most countries. What factors damage the environment and who should take responsibility?
Protection of the environment has become a controversial issue nowadays. I believe that humans are mainly attributable to the phenomenon and we should also be responsible for any affects of the development.
There are two main reasons behind the negative impacts upon the environment, which are the invasion and industrializing of natural areas by human beings. The first cause of the phenomenon is manufacture of goods and services. These operations demand natural resources and materials, which contribute greatly to the deterioration of the environment. This is because the production process in order to producing inputs for these manufacturers often leaves large amount of carbon footprint, waste and emission, which are the main culprits of pollution. More importantly, overpopulation also places the ecosystem at risk. Population upsurge and urbanisation silmutaneously boost demands for food, shelter to feed and accommodate growing number of people worldwide. The movement steadily jeorpadises the natural envionment by causing habitat loss for flora and fauna, thereby exacurbating environmental issues.
Responsibility for environmental deterioration should fall on individuals, business owners and the authorities. It is common that people, in general, favor convenience over harm on their world. The mindset subsequently results in increase in plastic use, widespread of fast-fashion and consumerism. This way of life encourages the disposal of artificial compounds, which are dangerous to the environment. Another responsible party for the damage of the natural world are tycoons, given their priority of profit and neglect of impacts on the nature. For example, some greedy firms' owners can go so far to dump wastes directly to land and water bodies, in order to avoid processing the disposal, which can cost them large sum of money. Finally, if political leaders overlook preservation of the environment because of corruption or lack of duty, they should also be blamed for consequences of negative natural catastrophes. These individuals are the ones who constitute the most of degration of nature in recent years.
In sum, development of industrialized areas and rise of population are threatening the planet. Ordinary people, business owners and governments should together be held responsible for destroying the nature.
| Post date | Users | Rates | Link to Content |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024-01-13 | tteruchan65 | 89 | view |
| 2023-09-02 | đam kim doan | 73 | view |
| 2023-05-20 | ttltpttdc | 61 | view |
| 2023-03-28 | wholemilk | 73 | view |
| 2023-01-13 | Kaito Mori | 11 | view |
- Some people think that staying in hotels is not a good option to know about a country or its people What do you think about this viewpoint 89
- Many people think that women should have given the same roles to male in military and police forces Many people think that women are not suitable for this job Discuss both views and give opinions 78
- Any country should be able to sell goods to other countries without the restrictions of the government Do you agree or disagree 89
- Some people believe that children should be taught about recycling and avoiding waste at home while others believe children should learn this at school Discuss both views and give your own opinion 84
- Some people believe that technology causes more problems for modern society than it solves Do you agree or disagree 89
Transition Words or Phrases used:
also, but, finally, first, if, look, so, for example, in general
Attributes: Values AverageValues Percentages(Values/AverageValues)% => Comments
Performance on Part of Speech:
To be verbs : 14.0 13.1623246493 106% => OK
Auxiliary verbs: 6.0 7.85571142285 76% => OK
Conjunction : 15.0 10.4138276553 144% => OK
Relative clauses : 8.0 7.30460921844 110% => OK
Pronoun: 14.0 24.0651302605 58% => OK
Preposition: 49.0 41.998997996 117% => OK
Nominalization: 22.0 8.3376753507 264% => Less nominalizations (nouns with a suffix like: tion ment ence ance) wanted.
Performance on vocabulary words:
No of characters: 1994.0 1615.20841683 123% => OK
No of words: 349.0 315.596192385 111% => OK
Chars per words: 5.71346704871 5.12529762239 111% => OK
Fourth root words length: 4.32221490584 4.20363070211 103% => OK
Word Length SD: 3.2909553736 2.80592935109 117% => OK
Unique words: 212.0 176.041082164 120% => OK
Unique words percentage: 0.607449856734 0.561755894193 108% => OK
syllable_count: 638.1 506.74238477 126% => OK
avg_syllables_per_word: 1.8 1.60771543086 112% => OK
A sentence (or a clause, phrase) starts by:
Pronoun: 7.0 5.43587174349 129% => OK
Article: 3.0 2.52805611222 119% => OK
Subordination: 1.0 2.10420841683 48% => OK
Conjunction: 0.0 0.809619238477 0% => OK
Preposition: 3.0 4.76152304609 63% => OK
Performance on sentences:
How many sentences: 19.0 16.0721442886 118% => OK
Sentence length: 18.0 20.2975951904 89% => OK
Sentence length SD: 38.9263812587 49.4020404114 79% => OK
Chars per sentence: 104.947368421 106.682146367 98% => OK
Words per sentence: 18.3684210526 20.7667163134 88% => OK
Discourse Markers: 3.36842105263 7.06120827912 48% => More transition words/phrases wanted.
Paragraphs: 4.0 4.38176352705 91% => OK
Language errors: 0.0 5.01903807615 0% => OK
Sentences with positive sentiment : 7.0 8.67935871743 81% => OK
Sentences with negative sentiment : 9.0 3.9879759519 226% => Less negative sentences wanted.
Sentences with neutral sentiment: 3.0 3.4128256513 88% => OK
What are sentences with positive/Negative/neutral sentiment?
Coherence and Cohesion:
Essay topic to essay body coherence: 0.141624926398 0.244688304435 58% => OK
Sentence topic coherence: 0.0406232043525 0.084324248473 48% => OK
Sentence topic coherence SD: 0.0427180653956 0.0667982634062 64% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence: 0.0856357185919 0.151304729494 57% => OK
Paragraph topic coherence SD: 0.0427827653249 0.056905535591 75% => OK
Essay readability:
automated_readability_index: 14.6 13.0946893788 111% => OK
flesch_reading_ease: 36.28 50.2224549098 72% => OK
smog_index: 11.2 7.44779559118 150% => OK
flesch_kincaid_grade: 12.7 11.3001002004 112% => OK
coleman_liau_index: 15.84 12.4159519038 128% => OK
dale_chall_readability_score: 10.18 8.58950901804 119% => OK
difficult_words: 125.0 78.4519038076 159% => OK
linsear_write_formula: 10.5 9.78957915832 107% => OK
gunning_fog: 9.2 10.1190380762 91% => OK
text_standard: 11.0 10.7795591182 102% => OK
What are above readability scores?
---------------------
Rates: 89.8876404494 out of 100
Scores by essay e-grader: 8.0 Out of 9
---------------------
Note: the e-grader does NOT examine the meaning of words and ideas. VIP users will receive further evaluations by advanced module of e-grader and human graders.